Welcome to INTJ Forum

This is a community where INTJs can meet others with similar personalities and discuss a wide variety of both serious and casual topics. If you aren't an INTJ, you're welcome to join anyway if you would like to learn more about this personality type or participate in our discussions. Registration is free and will allow you to post messages, see hidden subforums, customize your account and use other features only available to our members.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Neus

  • Rank


  • MBTI
  • Enneagram
  • Global 5/SLOAN
  • Astrology Sign
  • Personal DNA
    50% Gek, 50% Geek.
  • Brain Dominance


  • Biography
    I am an italian that loves physics, biology, chemistry, and math.
  • Location
    In your house, right behind you.
  • Occupation
    Try to quench my unquenchable thirst of knowledge.
  • Interests
    Sciences (particularly biology, physics and chemistry), philosophy, technology, and history.
  • Gender
  • Personal Text
    I am, I think.
  1. What is your definition of "perfection"? Do you believe in perfection? If yes, what is the thing that most relates with your concepts and definitions of " perfection"?
  2. What is the cryterion (or the cryterions) that you are using that allows you to establish that non-INTJs are normal? If you refer to "normal" from a statistical perspective (the rarity of an MBTI type distributed in the mondial population) then INTJs aren't the only to be "non-normal". Seriously, what you mean by "normal"? Anyway, INTJs do think using systems, just like any Rational.
  3. Although here almost everyone typed me as INTP, I think that ENTP fits better to me, if we want to consider cognitive functions. Actually, INTPs, since they have auxiliar Ne, they shouldn't have the same problems that I have. INTPs are better at controlling their Ne, from this point of view, since they are dominant Ti, and they naturally focus more on using it, rather than ENTPs.
  4. INTJ: 12% INTP: 88%
  5. Yes, this thing happened to me. It always happens to me when I don't learn nothing of interesting for more than a week, more or less. Why does it happen? It happens because my mind has to be constantly intellectually stimulated, and if it isn't, my mind says hello to everyone, and goes to the fantastic city of Sleepville. Try to ask him if he has read or learned something of interesting and new in this period.
  6. I am 12 years old. No, I am joking xD. I am 21 years old.
  7. Yeah, I suggest The Dark Tower series too.
  8. Thanks to you, Distance! Maybe the higher Si and the lower Fe could be just caused by my Asperger's, though. ...... added to this post 4 minutes later: Thanks anyway, Whoops. Every kind of help is appreciated. ...... added to this post 25 minutes later: The thing that puzzles me is that when I was in medium school, I was extremely extraverted. A classical, stereotyped and typical example of Extroverted. I was completely free by any kind of social anxiety. What the fuck happened to me then xD?
  9. Here you my result: Development is more than basic or developed use of processes in isolation. Excellent use of a cognitive process involves both basic and advanced use as appropriate, and ability to deploy other processes in its service. Average to good use usually means we can use the process in limited situations or use it well but only with the aid of other processes. Poor use means basic use at most. Finally, we may get ourselves into trouble when we don't use a process at all. Your Cognitive Development Profile The forty-eight questions you rated earlier tap into the eight cognitive processes. Some questions tapped into basic or developed use of a process used by itself, while other questions tapped into use of multiple processes at once. The profile below is based on your responses. The number of squares indicate strength of response. The equivalent numeric is shown in parentheses along with likely level of development. Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) extraverted Sensing (Se) ********************* (21.9) limited use introverted Sensing (Si) ********************* (21.8) limited use extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ****************************************************** (54.4) excellent use introverted Intuiting (Ni) *************************** (27.2) average use extraverted Thinking (Te) ********************************* (33.1) good use introverted Thinking (Ti) ************************************************** (50.6) excellent use extraverted Feeling (Fe) *************** (15.9) unused introverted Feeling (Fi) ************** (14.7) unused Summary Analysis of Profile By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ENTP Lead (Dominant) Process Extraverted Intuiting (Ne): Exploring the emerging patterns. Wondering about patterns of interaction across various situations. Checking what hypotheses and meanings fit best. Trusting what emerges as you shift a situation’s dynamics. Support (Auxilliary) Process Introverted Thinking (Ti): Gaining leverage (influence) using a framework. Detaching to study a situation from different angles and fit it to a theory, framework or principle. Checking for accuracy. Using leverage to solve the problem. If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: INTP, or ESTP If these results are different from what you know of yourself, you might consider why your developmental pattern does not align with your expectation. You might also consider exploring this result as a possible better fit. The Four Temperaments Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Theorist; secondly Catalyst; then Improviser; and lastly, Stabilizer. To read more about the four temperaments click here. Sixteen Patterns Jung observed that everyone has potential access to all eight cognitive processes but that we each prefer one as dominant — playing a lead role — with a second process playing a support role. Your two preferred cognitive processes allow you to do information gathering and decision making, introverting and extraverting. Maybe you prefer introverted Intuiting in a lead role with extraverted Feeling in a support role, or maybe you prefer extraverted Sensing in a lead role with introverted Thinking in a support role. Or maybe you prefer some other pairing. These pairings tap into sixteen possible patterns which are often represented using a 4-letter code. Here are the sixteen type patterns and the preferred cognitive processes associated with each: Type Lead Process. Support Process ESTP extraverted Sensing introverted Thinking ISTP introverted Thinking extraverted Sensing ESFP extraverted Sensing introverted Feeling ISFP introverted Feeling extraverted Sensing ESTJ extraverted Thinking introverted Sensing ISTJ introverted Sensing extraverted Thinking ESFJ extraverted Feeling introverted Sensing ISFJ introverted Sensing extraverted Feeling ENTJ extraverted Thinking introverted Intuiting INTJ introverted Intuiting extraverted Thinking ENTP extraverted Intuiting introverted Thinking INTP introverted Thinking extraverted Intuiting ENFJ extraverted Feeling introverted Intuiting INFJ introverted Intuiting extraverted Feeling ENFP extraverted Intuiting introverted Feeling INFP introverted Feeling extraverted Intuiting.
  10. Interesting. I have also taken another similar test a couple of weeks ago, and mine results are posted here. Would you be so gentle to provide me an analysis of that result, and the conclusion that you have come to so far about my type? Thanks in advance.
  11. First test results: Type 1: 4 Type 2: 1 Type 3: 4 Type 4: 6 Type 5: 7 Type 6: 2 Type 7: 6 Type 8: 2 Type 9: 4. As regards the second test, this is the result: Big Five Test Results Extroversion||||||||||32% Orderliness||||18% Emotional Stability||||||||||||||60% Accommodation||||20% Inquisitiveness||||||||||||||||||||86% The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension: Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private. Orderliness results were low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment. Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic. Accommodation results were low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others. Inquisitiveness results were very high which suggests you are extremely intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical. Your Global5/SLOAN type is RCUEI Your Primary type is Inquisitive. Thanks for these tests, Distance.
  12. OK, and I am sorry for my irrational and unusual reaction. You and Teybo are right. Very bad day today for me. This don't justifies my reaction, however. Anyway, I think that under certain conditions (more specifically, under mine conditions, for example. I have wrote that I have some disorder that impairs me in social situations, not sure whether it is, though, but more probably Asperger's Syndrome or social anxiety) an MBTI typing based just on dichotomies couldn't work. What do you think about it?
  13. Heihachi Mishima and my red fox squirrel, yes, they use the same hair stylist. 

  14. I knew you would do a post like that, Teybo. Just by looking the kind of questions that you asked to me. But this thread wasn't started to create a debate about MBTI cognitive functions. I have my reasons to disagree with you, but I don't want to explain them and start HERE a debate with you about it (which very probably is what you wanted to do). If you want to do a debate about it, start a thread somewhere else, and we will discuss there, or, simply, PM me, for fuck's sake.