Welcome to INTJ Forum

This is a community where INTJs can meet others with similar personalities and discuss a wide variety of both serious and casual topics. If you aren't an INTJ, you're welcome to join anyway if you would like to learn more about this personality type or participate in our discussions. Registration is free and will allow you to post messages, see hidden subforums, customize your account and use other features only available to our members.

Teybo

Core Member
  • Content count

    4,604
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

About Teybo

  • Rank
    Core Member

Personality

  • MBTI
    INFJ
  • Global 5/SLOAN
    IvtOpnAgrConNeu

Converted

  • Gender
  1. I don't think that was what Namesake was getting at.
  2. Reasons for assertions are relevant to some.
  3. E3 is about the idea that you will be loved when others believe you are successful. It's not just competence. The most common correlate to E3 is Extraversion. ENTJ, ESTJ, ENTP, and ENFJ are all commonly 3s. Notice that ESTJ, ENTP, and ENFJ are all one-letter-flips away from ENTJ. ESTP 3s may also be common, but I don't have enough data to be sure.
  4. Better to think of it as a spectrum with two extremes and a lot of fuzziness in the middle rather than to think of it as two fundamentally different creatures that could be mishmashed and be "both" at the same time. Think different hues and shades rather than Frankenstein's dog-cat.
  5. To start: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(statistics)
  6. Ok, I'm going to not contribute, then. I don't see the point of putting scientifically validated measures of personality on the same playing field with unscientific personality theories.
  7. Are you interested in ... like ... everything under the sun, or more the stuff that has at least some scientific validity?
  8. @Yume Your list really downplays the primary role of Intuition with regard to that ranking of types w/r/t grades. I recommend looking into the relationships between need for cognition, FFM Openness/Intellect and MBTI Intuition. If that list says anything, it says that Intuition should really be the foundation and focus rather than Introversion.
  9. If you don't erase "dumb" (or, as Echoflame clarified, someone self-admittedly uninterested in cognitive engagements), how does that change your conclusion?
  10. Welcome to the loony bin! :D
  11. I'm reading and responding to what Echoflame wrote. You are having a delusional fantasy about something else. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sometimes a person being pleasant and jovial is just a person being pleasant and jovial. You have some weird need to create a hypothetical to argue about. Read the OP. Come back to reality. And maybe stop replying to my posts.
  12. The science suggests that the ability to have mutually enjoyable conversations is really the key thing to relationship satisfaction.
  13. For the upteenth time, scorp, type is about likelihoods and tendencies, not absolutes. These posts of yours where you take my probabilistic inference about personality tendencies and twist it into an unrecognizable black-and-white absolutism about all sorts of unrelated things are both tiring and meaningless.
  14. I'm typing this way: E: "Includes everyone. Talks to strangers constantly." "Always laughing and smiling." F: "Never say a bad word about anyone." "Will go way out of his way to help someone he just met." P: "Not at all planned, very spontaneous person. Takes life one day at a time." F+P: "No real work ethic but will work hard to help people." S: "they often don't try to think deeply. I actually remember them calling themselves dumb and laughing it off, not the least bit upset about it. And being very easily impressed when others show or do anything intelligent." Remember that MBTI type doesn't define everything about a person and that there is still variation between people who share the same type. There are Es who don't include everyone or talk to strangers constantly. There are Ps who are more planful than other Ps (although maybe not as planful as the average J). And so on. It's expected that there are some ESFPs who are more inclined toward "nice" behavior than other ESFPs. In addition, the specific circumstances in which you interact with someone will also influence both their inclination to be "nice" as well as your perception of them as "nice". If you kick an ESFPs dog, I doubt they're going to be nice to you, for instance. (Not that you would kick a dog, just an example.)
  15. You're describing typical aspects of E+F+P, maybe particularly ESFP rather than ENFP if "sort of dumb" is an important characteristic to dwell on.