|
|
#26 | |||
|
Member [20%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 827
|
But... Leggings ARE pants. I wear them most days, though I'd usually wear a long top to cover my ass, unless doing sport. I don't see the problem, unless you're talking about those people who wear leggings stretched so tight you can see through them :/ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Core Member [407%]
|
Long story short, don't objectify women.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |||
|
Member [03%]
MBTI: InTJ
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 150
|
LOL! speaking of leggings.. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |||
|
Core Member [660%]
|
Amen, bro. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||||||
|
Member [40%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,633
|
Lol,I have seen that before[male perspective] just scratching my head are you seriously going to work wearing that?
Lol,I do agree. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |||
|
Member [09%]
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Core Member [226%]
|
A man dressed up looks much more professional than a woman dressed up because the woman has sexualized herself. That is a big problem. Women want to be taken seriously but they dress like they want to be viewed as sex objects. If a woman wants to be respected for what she knows then she should stop focusing so much on what she looks like beyond simply being well groomed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |||
|
Member [17%]
|
I watched that video. And it is, sadly, true. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Core Member [512%]
|
Why would a woman dress provocatively in the workplace?
It's something I've never been able to understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |||
|
Member [02%]
|
This made me laugh- I recall that exact episode. I find that women in suits look more professional than skank ass ho's like that girl, and all the others that take out loans to get breast augmentations prior to being sued. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |||
|
Core Member [410%]
|
Why would women dress like futzy old maids at work? Why would women dress like men at work? Why would women dress like anything, at anytime? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |||
|
Member [17%]
|
We all known women's bodies are just for men's pleasure anyway, why can't they just walk naked? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |||
|
Core Member [410%]
|
Burkas would fix all the world's problems! So this is what Feminism fought for. The need to look like shit. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,268
|
If there is such a thing as "dressing as woman" and "dressing as a man" then we should just go back to the 1950's.
I'd prefer we have the gender roles more codified. I thought we were all supposed to be equal, but it's obvious that that isn't true from what the women are saying here. I thought the whole point was that there should just be one way to dress for everyone as equals. I guess that's not what is wanted. Well, keep women in the home then, where are more properly dressed as women. Men can keep to the office, where they can continue to dress as men. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |||
|
Core Member [512%]
|
I was just coming back to edit my post to "Why would a person dress provocatively in the workplace?" |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |||
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,268
|
This video so far makes no sense to me. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |||
|
Core Member [410%]
|
More nonsense. Codified dressing like men, for both men and women. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,268
|
Also really weird, almost all of the images they cite are images from high fashion used to sell things to...other women...
Why are women buying into these images exactly? Apparently they are the main customers apparently? I agree that women never have to "grow up" though. That shit should definitely change. hah |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |||
|
Core Member [410%]
|
Are women not sexual beings? Must they appear androgynous? Why should women be ashamed of their bodies? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |||
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,268
|
You can't say people's opinion's are nonsense... |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |||
|
Core Member [410%]
|
Go back and read your post. It's pure nonsense. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |||
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,268
|
So treating them like sex objects is cool then? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |||
|
Core Member [410%]
|
I'm arguing for freedom for women to dress as they choose within the corporate guidelines of acceptable attire. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | ||||||
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,268
|
You seem to be unable to even article a coherent stance on anything, every post of yours is basically flinging some kind of insult at someone from some emotional ideology that you yourself don't even seem to understand...
Who argued against it?
Last edited by ManWithNoName; 06-20-2012 at 06:43 AM.
Reason: Rule #1 Personal Attack.
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |||||||||
|
Core Member [410%]
|
Then don't engage with me. Read your post. What you're advocating is that equality is geared on clothing and if we don't become androgynous in our outfits, we need to go back to 1950 gender roles? Like WTF?
---------- Post added 06-19-2012 at 04:30 PM ----------
Really, could have sworn I was debating against the burka supporters with comfortable shoes. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|