|
|
#26 | |||
|
New Member [01%]
|
neutrino bars = mass (m) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Core Member [168%]
|
A latino that isn't in a gang?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |||
|
New Member [01%]
|
If you know the answer, could you please give it to me? I need to work tomorrow and I can't sleep if I don't know the answer and I feel that Thod is not coming back today. If you don't know could you be so nice to ask for a Physicist in the chatroom as I'm not allowed to go there yet? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Core Member [168%]
|
Sorry, I don't know much about what people do here for proffession. I think maybe Kisai might know, but he isn't online. If it is something you really need now, maybe you could ask people who post a lot in the science forum if they know people who could help you.
---------- Post added 04-15-2012 at 11:35 PM ---------- I've been skimming through this thread a bit and it reminds me of what this guy discovered in Holland. I saw him explain it on TV. I wonder if it is the same thing he talks about and has discovered but it is a different name, maybe the Dutch translation. He is Leo Kouwenhoven from Delft university. A Majorana-fermion = (1 elektron + 1 gat)/2 . On the tv-show he explained that if they had a copper wire as thin as approximately a nanameter. At a point in the wire they put this chemicals around the wire and at the end they put another set of chemicals around the wire but only half around it. That created a mirror image of some things that popped up but this Majorana particle showed up but it wasn't mirrored. The Majorana also had a negative Majorana. But the Majoranas both were 0. There has been theories about the Majorana existing but no proof, he was able too get an electric signal from the positive Majorana (or if I guess he proofed it got electrical resistance). He said he got sponsored by Microsoft and Microsoft did that so they got more easily get license on nano-technology. In about 50 years maybe he said computers could be reinvented because of what he discovered because Majoranas could be used for a whole new way of information processing, on nanalevel, with quantums or something.
Last edited by Zodd; 04-15-2012 at 02:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
New Member [01%]
|
Do you mean
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ? I'm not sure what it will do for my solution to the joke here, but it is indeed quite interesting in the field of quantum computing. Another thing Leo Kouwenhoven researched is a new measurement of electrons. It is a tube with the width of 1 nanometer. When they let the tube resonate on a very high frequency it is theoretically able to sense the landing of 1 electron by analyzing the sound of the tubes amplitude. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Core Member [168%]
|
Yeah that is it, they showed that little animationvideo on tv also, though he tried too explain it using lego.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |||
|
Core Member [182%]
|
bwahaha! :D :D :D |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |||
|
Core Member [163%]
MBTI: INTP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,554
|
Nah, it was a reference to the energy-time uncertainty principle. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |||||||||
|
Veteran Member [60%]
|
Yeah since I'm not too familiar with particle physics, I can't recognize that formula. But definitely the conservation of lepton number is the biggest reason for the existence of neutrinos.
Yeah she's probably INTP (though she could also be INTJ). And I'm seriously jealous of her now. That ANTARES telescope is ubercool and working on software to filter out background radiation must be an amazing job for a scientist. Every once in a while, a neutrino hitting the water will create a muon in the water and by seeing the light trail left by the muon, ANTARES will be able to figure out the direction from which the neutrino came. This will let them "map" out neutrino sources in the sky.
Err? Are you referring to the Feynman interpretation of antiparticles as particles going back in time? |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |||
|
Veteran Member [85%]
MBTI: INTP
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,413
|
At my handwaving level of understanding, it's the "quantum of mass", that is its interaction with particles which do not otherwise have mass imparts them mass. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Member [37%]
|
Neutrinos. Sounds like a kid's granola snack or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |||||||||
|
New Member [01%]
|
Bummer, so far for the "being a physicist in disguise" theory
I suppose it would be ubercool if you're really into it and she is working on this research for 11 years already. I guess you need a lot of patience working in the physicist field before seeing any results. Good things happen to whom are willing to wait should be their motto
More like a diet snack if I got the story right |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member [09%]
|
Hope this helps.
There had to be some corrections in my own thinking. So this is provided as one makes their way through new scientific processes that have come on line. [hide=Credit: Weiqun Zhang and Stan Woosley- This image is from a computer simulation of the beginning of a gamma-ray burst. Here we see the jet 9 seconds after its creation at the center of a Wolf Rayet star by the newly formed, accreting black hole within. The jet is now just erupting through the surface of the Wolf Rayet star, which has a radius comparable to that of the sun. Blue represents regions of low mass concentration, red is denser, and yellow denser still. Note the blue and red striations behind the head of the jet. These are bounded by internal shocks.] To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [/hide] GRB's were held in my mind as a motivated expression but as you can see some of these things have been ruled out? To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| physics |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|