|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Member [63%]
|
I don't know if this belongs more in Politics or Computers, but
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . Is anyone suspicious of the timing? Feels almost like the feds are cracking down to scare all the folks who were protesting by blacking out major sites yesterday. At any rate, I don't support piracy, but I'm completely against ACTA, SOPA, and Protect IP as they currently stand. They're one-sided regulations that unfairly benefit the entertainment industry and unfairly detract from consumers' ability to enjoy the free flow of information on the Internet. (Yes, I'm a bit biased--I just turned in the final draft of an article about ACTA that might get published.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Veteran Member [87%]
|
I don't know why you are complaining. This is just a part of the master plan of our benevolent overlords to keep us safe, by inhibiting those dangerous freedoms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Core Member [113%]
|
When they shut down Napster, did that stop people from downloading music?
The feds are fighting a losing battle, and they should know it. The MPAA is going to learn the hard way to never piss off the internet when a bunch of irritated computer nerds finally grow tired of their nonsense and hack all their shit. Hell, To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. .... What happened when the feds went after Anonymous and the CEO of HBGary, an Internet security company got ballsy? To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. and literally said "don't fuck with Anonymous". This is nothing but a desperate show of force prompted by the MPAA. But everyone and their mother seems to know this barking dog lacks teeth. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Veteran Member [88%]
|
First they ban online poker now this. If I were a hacker I'd be gearing up for a serious cyber war...
Question: If a site like MegaUpload is hosted on a server outside the US is it beyond their jurisdiction? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member [33%]
|
All I keep thinking too myself is are people that greedy that they go to sooooo much effort?
Anyway, we all know it's gonna fail. Nothing to see here folks. Keep it moving. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member [35%]
|
Eh who cares. I use usenet anyways (i.e. Newzbin) and whenever their site gets shut down, a clone one replaces it the next day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
Veteran Member [63%]
|
Generally no. The Pirate Bay was located in Sweden, and Megaupload was apparently based in Hong Kong (the people they arrested are in New Zealand). I don't know about e-jurisdiction yet (though I plan to take a class on it), but I'd guess that because the locus of the sites' illegal activity was computers in the US, they can probably be sued there AND where their servers AND headquarters are located. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Veteran Member [51%]
|
Apparently Annon has now taken down the MPAA, RIAA, and the U.S. Department of Justice websites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
Veteran Member [63%]
|
I often question whether Anonymous really has the best motives (they seem to do things "just because" at least as often as for good reasons), but...in this case it's called for. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Core Member [229%]
|
They've also taken down the sites of Universal Music, who I think were responsible for the lawsuit, and copyright.gov.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
Member [07%]
|
I disagree. This can potentially discredit and undermine the legitimate protests that took place yesterday. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Veteran Member [87%]
|
The United States Government has issed a statement in regards to liberty:
"The beatings will continue until morale improves" |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member [36%]
|
Just to point out some issues here. While preventing filesharing on the interbutts is futile, that alone does not automatically make it right to profit off someone else's work in this manner. The police said Megaupload made $175 million in profits from membership fees and advertising. I do not know whether this figure is true, and there is no word on the portion of revenue that came from actually distributing copyrighted material, but there is undeniably piracy afoot which justifies arresting the heads of the operation. I don't see a cause for righteous, anti-government fury over this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
New Member [01%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4
|
Does anyone think its wrong that they can take down a website like this without so much as a trial or hearing? Or does innocent until proven guilty not stand anymore? Shouldn't they be able to give their side before this sort of damage is done to their business?
There are legitimate and legal forms of filesharing. And, I may be wrong but, isn't the current policy under the DMCA that a website must remove infringing content at the request of a copyright holder (which Megaupload often did)? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Core Member [181%]
|
what? oh no!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
Core Member [109%]
|
Oh well. Another porn file-sharing website taken down.
Is "Kim Dotcom" a real name? Sounds like the name of a dodgy website to me (kim.com). |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
Veteran Member [63%]
|
People actually do that--they change their legal name so it's harder to use a certain name as their own. If your company is called kim.com and your name is Kim Dotcom, that's two sources of evidence on your side. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member [42%]
|
Will not really be missed, I watched a few TV shows on there but they moved recently. I never was a big fan of megaupload but it was semi-useful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Core Member [106%]
|
The Government wants to put them out of business, so that They can take Megaupload's place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |||
|
Veteran Member [62%]
|
So they don't really need SOPA to do this shit after all. SOPA will only make things easier. I guess America had set out to piss off everyone, not just brown Middle Eastern people.
You couldn't have missed the point more if you wanted to kick a baby and ended up destroying Japan instead. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
|
Veteran Member [53%]
|
Here's |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member [03%]
|
Home of the free my ass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Veteran Member [87%]
|
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Outstanding! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |||
|
Core Member [113%]
|
There's an inherent problem in that logic, which I will point out using you as an example using nice round numbers: |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Veteran Member [59%]
|
They are just gonna keep taking, exponentially with each new precedent we let them set, people just dont care if it doesn't affect them specifically. Watch this one as it works its way into invading our privacy. The way I see it, if the government can work its way from the fourth amendment to searching citizens body fluids, the internet doesn't have a chance.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| in the news, law |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|