|
|
#51 | ||||||
|
Core Member [117%]
|
Thirty this week?
My position on dating down. Met a flat hot public ivy grad with a solid career and personality on Wednesday, and a cute Yale grad last night. The public ivy is girlfriend material if she turns out to be a decent human being after a few months. The Yale gal had personality on par with lawn furniture, but was still an 8 or so. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | ||||||||||||
|
Veteran Member [53%]
|
Nonetheless, it is better. Let's face it; certain kinds of people are more appealing to others.
I originally kept my profile simple to begin with; no bites. After tweaking it considerably, I've since given up on the idea of making the perfect profile. It's either too long, too short, not enough details, too bland, too zany, etc. I figure, that if I'm going to write about myself, I may as well enjoy it. Now, my profile takes up at least two pages, which I understand is too much for the illiterate masses.
I've stopped answering questions after #500. There comes a point where more is not necessarily better.
These past 3 months, actually. But now that you ask, yesterday I decided to visit at least 50 profiles, starting down from the highest match results to the lowest 30% (which I feel is a good cutoff; such profiles become radically incompatible with mine). Today, no visitations, but we'll see how the rest of the week fares if I keep this up. Perhaps 50 different profile visits a day, 350 a week, will yield better results? |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Veteran Member [85%]
MBTI: INTP
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,413
|
30 in 3 months seems fairly low. I've lingered around 15 visits/week for a while now. Do you live somewhere that isn't all that heavily populated?
Also, I kinda started answering the questions for fun; I don't really do it to try to improve matches much anymore. Though I have gone in to the questions of people I've been talking with and answered some of what they've answered. It's kinda fun watching the numbers actually change appreciably in real time like that To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by Latro; 01-13-2012 at 09:21 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |||
|
Veteran Member [53%]
|
El Paso, Texas, has 1,000,000 people and is also a very poor border town (which may explain the utter lack of local OKC members) . |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Member [20%]
|
I pretty much log in to OKC on the bus to work, just to ensure my profile stays active. Sometimes I'll check my visitors (I average ~2 per week) and rarely I'll bother messaging someone.
Today was remarkable in that I got a message out of the blue. Unfortunately her pictures don't reveal how attractive (or not) she may be, as she seems to adore huge sunglasses. But she is well-travelled, so there's something interesting to talk about. Question: how quickly do you turn website contact into IRL meeting? I've had equal success (i.e., not a lot) with asking immediately and asking a few messages in. Is it just that some girls actually do want to meet and some are just on there for a lark? |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | ||||||
|
Veteran Member [85%]
MBTI: INTP
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,413
|
I was told by a girl who has been on the site for a while that you get a lot of activity if you get in the activity feed on the home page, which you can do by doing...pretty much anything on the site really. Uploading photos and answering questions *with explanations* tends to do it the most I think, but even just editing your profile will get you on there.
I've actually only done this once (in regards to the other meeting the girl asked me to hang out), but the way the conversation flowed I could see it working well over and over again if you're going into the conversation with the goal of meeting the person IRL. Sketch of conversation structure: This was in the first conversation (which was on IM), hence the "small talk" at the beginning. There were no messages or anything beforehand. That whole block of conversation was about 90 minutes, with some silences (we're both shy), so probably more like 75 minutes of actual back and forth. (This sort of structure is probably rather obvious to many of you reading this; sorry for coming off that way. I'm a really poor conversationalist and very rarely see the structure of conversations like this, so I thought this was kinda profound.)
Last edited by Latro; 01-16-2012 at 11:01 AM.
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Member [20%]
|
I see I see... I've never had a response on OKC's IM system. I'm not on there for hours at a time and I guess neither are the girls I contact. In any case, I guess it's something you just have to play by ear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Veteran Member [53%]
|
Okay, so after visiting around 300+ profiles, and changing+adding photos, I now have...30 visits in the past 3 days...and no messages. On the plus side, I changed my radius to "anywhere" and can find ladies in the 90% percentile quite easily. The downside: Virtually all of them are at least 1,000 miles away!
Good grief! I feel like I'm stranded on an alien planet, and I'm the alien! |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |||
|
Veteran Member [85%]
MBTI: INTP
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,413
|
Just keeping a tab open, especially at night, can help, if the sort of girls you're interested in are the kind who might IM you first.
Last edited by Latro; 01-15-2012 at 07:39 PM.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Member [09%]
|
It's not much better if you're a reasonably attractive female. Tack on being intelligent and an INTJ at that, and the emails you receive are utterly absurd.
The ridiculous # of emails I received after unhiding my match.com profile two days ago almost made me depressed. It's a clear reminder of how most of the human population is extremely out of touch with reality. At least 70% of the guys have profiles with heinous grammar and spelling mistakes, are not even average looking (I'm really not an asshole about looks, seriously), and say things like, "I'm looking for a fun, sweet girl who shares my passion for sports and traveling, and doesn't like to play games." I'm not a pretentious bitch, I swear, but I don't need to go on a date to know that I'm not compatible with someone who spends 10 months out of the year glued to their television, and hasn't read a book since highschool or college. I don't even have cable, for fuck's sake, which I mention in my profile to ward off some of the ill-suited responses. I also mention that I'm an introvert, and I shit you not, 7 out of ten emails say "judging by your profile, there is no way you are an introvert." Sighhhhh. I don't understand this phoenomenon. I am self aware, and I don't email guys who have 15 photos of themselves in cowboy hats and boots, or fishing and hunting, wearing camo, or guys who have 20 pics of themselves with their boys and/or bitches in the club getting bottle service. What is the malfunction of people who enjoy wasting their time? |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |||
|
Veteran Member [53%]
|
On the bright side...there are men who want you. Trust me, it's a lot worse in our position where hardly anyone introduces themselves to you, if at all. Kinda gives the impression to a lot of guys that nobody wants them; now THAT is a good reason to be depressed! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |||
|
Member [11%]
|
I've never really understood this complaint that girls have. If you're so popular why don't you just ignore your incoming mails from "strangers" and only communicate with people you have contacted yourself in the first place?
Last edited by qstoffe; 01-16-2012 at 11:38 PM.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Member [09%]
|
Well, I did admit that we have it a little better than you...
I guess I think I owe people at least the "I'm not interested" response for putting themselves out there, and that's why I don't delete them immediately. It seems as though you guys would be less pessimistic about the whole process if most women gave the same courtesy that I do, no? |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |||
|
Core Member [413%]
|
I think a null response is better than an explicit denial. :D |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Member [48%]
|
This last week has been solid, guess I was wrong about online dating. Got a date with the girl being the one that showed interest in me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |||
|
Member [09%]
|
Fair enough. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |||
|
Core Member [413%]
|
Wanted: One strange introvert seeking another strange introvert! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |||
|
Core Member [229%]
|
Only if you both want a "meat market" and are capable of participating well in one. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | ||||||
|
Member [09%]
|
I'm not saying you won't have to develop a system of eliminating the 95% of ones who are looking for that type of thing, but it's possible to find people who are not...
Heh, the first line of my profile says: I'm an odd girl. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |||
|
Member [20%]
|
I would much prefer an explicit denial! At the very least it shows that the girl bothered to click "reply", rather than delete me with a raft of other nobodies. I like my existence to be acknowledged, even if I'm not what you're looking for! :--] |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | ||||||
|
Veteran Member [85%]
MBTI: INTP
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,413
|
I think you misunderstood his metaphor. I read it more as "a place where people are judged, assessed, and then put down in favor of the next one as if they were meat". Not "a place where you meet people to have sex with them".
...what are corresponding male numbers on that site? You've gotten more messages in 36 hours than I've gotten in 2 months. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Veteran Member [53%]
|
Well, it turns out that this online dating thing is bearing fruit! Just yesterday, I was finally approached by this lady who OKC placed as one of my top matches in my local area. Now, I already read her profile before, but it was too short for my liking; I tend to place emphasis on those who put more effort into it. Still, a pleasant surprise; turns out, we have a good deal in common! Plus, the fact that she works in a university conducting scholarly studies means I won't get bored.
We're scheduled to have lunch tomorrow, so we'll see what happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |||
|
Member [48%]
|
Sounds like you moved pretty fast. haha |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |||
|
Veteran Member [53%]
|
Well, it did take over two months for her to make the first move. But yeah, things seem to be improving. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Member [20%]
|
GLHF mate. Hopefully you'll be another online matchmaking success story!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| dating, online dating |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|