|
|
#1 |
|
Member [02%]
|
Authors@google just released a video on the neuroscience of personality:
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (It's over an hour long ... sorry). Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member [01%]
|
Just finished, nothing too special but entertaining enough if you have nothing to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Core Member [220%]
|
Very interesting, and just what I've been looking for. Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Veteran Member [92%]
|
I enjoyed it; thank you. Notice how he kept saying 'well except two types'
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. those darn INTJs and INTPs always causing trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Core Member [334%]
|
I'm thinking about buying his book. If his tests are indeed accurate, then there is a biological backing to how we act and I want to know more.
I would have liked to see more about the INTJs. He didn't really mention us, unless we're the X-Mass light people whom he never described with an MBTI name. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member [01%]
|
I found this very interesting! I do wish he spoke more about INTJs, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Core Member [151%]
|
Interesting video. I'd like to see more of his data, and some further discussion of the results for specific personality types.
Neuroscience of Personality doesn't seem to be available on Amazon.com, but here's a link to a brief description from Radiance House (a Nardi site): To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. I haven't decided whether to pay my $25 and get the book yet. There should be a substantial amount of information in it, as it's 200 pages long, not one of Nardi's 50-page booklets. If anyone has read it I'd love to hear more about the contents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
Core Member [176%]
|
Yep, and sample sizes too. This is crucial. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
Core Member [151%]
|
The results can be entertaining. I sometimes catch myself thinking of myself as an invisible thinker-observer, and then I suddenly turn out to be visible after all, as is the popcorn in my hair, the freakish look on my face, or whatever it is that everyone finds funny. I need an invisibility cloak! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Core Member [250%]
|
i only had the patience to skim through the video, so i may have missed the section where this was covered and may not even understand it fully; but i wonder what the independent variable was? they have their assessment of what people's brains indicate their preferences are, and they have those people's own assessments of their preferences (what they think they are), but at what point does the coalescence become controlled, maintained objectively?
*continues watching in case the answer becomes evident* ---------- Post added 02-15-2012 at 03:28 PM ---------- well, i can totally relate to what he said about INTPs and embarrassment... it's good to know this behavior is almost normal. almost. i also find what he said of ENTJs to be true in my experience; remembering more details, but more often wrong. almost... like... they're remembering... something... the way... they want to. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
Member [11%]
|
Nardi said in the presentation that the Christmas tree light people were likely to be NPs. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Veteran Member [80%]
|
Any Japanese INFP's on here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
New Member [01%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 5
|
Don't have time to watch this now, so im commenting in order to be able to trace the post back.
Gonna watch the video tomorrow night and let you know what i think then To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member [09%]
|
I stopped watching T.V a while ago, I't's my opinion that it's the worst thing humanity has ever made. According to his readings watching T.V results in pretty much a complete blank brained state.
Fuck T.V. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member [32%]
|
Don't quote me on this, but, I'm pretty sure Dr. Dario Nardi is an INTP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
Veteran Member [80%]
|
It's also been linked to ADHD. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
Core Member [109%]
|
That worries me a bit. I'm an INTP. We do castles in the air quite a lot. Our stuff is usually, either blindingly clear, or way off-base. This stuff doesn't quite seem that clear to me. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
Member [11%]
|
To: Eye on Earth on this subject, or anyone else interested here is what I found re: that Christmas tree brain.
check out the reference to ultimate brainstormers. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Got to run. ---------- Post added 02-16-2012 at 12:34 PM ----------
Sorry to disappoint. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
Core Member [250%]
|
it hardly matters as to the 'clarity' of what he was saying, which was merely outlining patterns in brain activity correlated to MBTI type, but i very much doubt an INTP would be able to do such a good job keeping up a constant, focused stream of chatter, and been able to connect with the audience as well as he did. ENTP is the impression i got. this leaves me wishing he'd mentioned his own type. also that i had the book. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member [11%]
|
I actually found his presentation to be a bit flat starting out. Then when he got to the things that excited him about the project he perked up. So, typing him based on the presentation, ...I don't know??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
|
Member [32%]
|
I've witnessed numerous INTPs and ENTPs give speeches. I'm speaking from experience. This guy is an INTP. Keep in mind that just because someone is comfortable giving speeches doesn't mean they are extroverted. Their are plenty of famous stage individuals who are introverts. Additionally, it appeared to me that the audience was small rather than large. You fail to take into consideration what an INTP can do that has developed himself. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |||
|
Member [09%]
|
Very interesting. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |||
|
Core Member [148%]
|
I think TV has more of a negative effect during the infant and toddler years when neuron connections are suppose to be created rather rapidly. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |||
|
Core Member [250%]
|
he's not just giving a speech from rote, he's actively engaged in discussing his ideas. coherently. over a span of quite some time. but none if this is very relevant, because he could just as easily be an ENTJ, or an INFP. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |||
|
Member [32%]
|
I'm referring to non-rote speeches. Keep in mind this guy has studied the topic for 5 years. He had to get a PhD wherein he had to write a book and present his ideas to a board (to illustrate that he is more than likely quite competent). I wouldn't doubt he understands the topic well enough to spontaneously discuss and answer questions. How are you exactly eliminating that possibility for INTPs to be able to accomplish such? |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|