Harvesting sperm from the dead.

**notoppings** · 04-25-2008, 11:39 AM

It is possible to harvest viable sperm from a dead man for 24 hours.
Do you believe that if a man signs a donor card that this also includes his sperm? (chopping off his testicles) and freezing them for later use.

While living a man decides that he doesn't want to have children but after death his wife or family members can choose to preserve his sperm to insure his progeny. What are your thoughts.

**Motor Jax** · 04-25-2008, 11:51 AM

you mean within 24 hrs?

and before rigor mortis sets in?

Motor Jax added to this post, 1 minutes and 55 seconds later...

actually, that would be kinda morbid

"hey, he JUST died. quick! his testicles!"

and in front of the widow too?

**bucolic_** · 04-25-2008, 12:22 PM

	Originally Posted by Motor Jax To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	you mean within 24 hrs? and before rigor mortis sets in? Motor Jax added to this post, 1 minutes and 55 seconds later... actually, that would be kinda morbid "hey, he JUST died. quick! his testicles!" and in front of the widow too?

You should see what they do to organ donors. As little as possible goes to waste.

**notoppings** · 04-25-2008, 12:26 PM

Yeah seems pretty gross to me. I was just wondering if you thought that his wishes to not have kids while he was alive are now void due to his death, does the surviving wife have the right to bring a child into this world absent the father and against his living wishes.

**Motor Jax** · 04-25-2008, 12:30 PM

well, does it count if you've already been cut?

imean, the big H anyways

and i'm an organ donor

Motor Jax added to this post, 3 minutes and 15 seconds later...

	Originally Posted by notoppings
	Yeah seems pretty gross to me. I was just wondering if you thought that his wishes to not have kids while he was alive are now void due to his death, does the surviving wife have the right to bring a child into this world absent the father and against his living wishes.

well, i guess

but, i hope they realize that they would have to raise that kid on their own since they couldn't possibly get any support from the dead husband, unless he haunted her or something, and even then pretty difficult

**notoppings** · 04-25-2008, 12:33 PM

Do you think that she could sue the estate for support because she has a living heir?

**Motor Jax** · 04-25-2008, 12:38 PM

i wouldn't think so since it was her wish, and not the estates... probably not even her (late) husband

**blueback** · 04-26-2008, 07:01 PM

That brings up all kinds of crazy thoughts.

What if you started a business where you sell famous people's sperm? You could mug them, shove a syringe into their nuts, grab some sperm, and then disappear. Sell the sperm on the black market. . .I think you could create a whole new industry.

**PRBori** · 04-28-2008, 06:33 AM

Hmmm....

Clinically extraction should take place within the first 24/hrs after death, but there have being extraction as far as 36/hrs.

Although unethical, I will have to say that if the person was someone I LOVED and had never had kids... and their parents always wished to have a little one I MAY Consider it...

But of course before taking such action I would have to sit down and think carefully... very carefully... for this will be a very personal decision which needs to be basedo on many aspects of my personal life. Considering also that it will be a child who will not have his father around, considering that if I do it will be my full responsability to support the child...

All in all if I was in a stable financial situation at the time, and all other aspects I must consider where in place there is less than 1% chance to do so... but 99.9% is NO.

That's just my personal view on the situation, of course if it actually did happen that would be a different story, but it has gone thru my mind a few times in my life for no specific reasons... except for those stories I have read

**Motor Jax** · 04-28-2008, 07:13 AM

	Originally Posted by PRBori To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	All in all if I was in a stable financial situation at the time, and all other aspects I must consider where in place there is a 1% chance to do so... but 99.9% is NO.

actually, that would be .1%, which would be <1%

but yeah, that is unethical

and especially since the child wouldn't be made out of love, but for simple child-bearing reasons

how can a kid know his father loved him, but father wasn't even aware of him?

i think that would also kinda mess a kid up, wouldn't it?

"mom, how was i born?"

"well son, you father died and we extracted..."

i can see how that can go during Career Day though

**PRBori** · 04-28-2008, 07:23 AM

	Originally Posted by Motor Jax To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	actually, that would be .1%, which would be <1% but yeah, that is unethical and especially since the child wouldn't be made out of love, but for simple child-bearing reasons

Actually, this is something that could have being arranged prior to the death as a consentual matter between the two parties who did LOVE each other at one time. Is similar to Vitro infertilization on my way of seing things..


	how can a kid know his father loved him, but father wasn't even aware of him? i think that would also kinda mess a kid up, wouldn't it? "mom, how was i born?" "well son, you father died and we extracted..."

I don't see much different between that and Vitro Fertilization where women just go to a Sperm bank in order to have kids using the sperm of someone they never met or knew in their life. I'm sure there are ways to deal with the kids as they get older, there are plenty of kids who are born without their fathers around.. no need to give too many details.

**Motor Jax** · 04-28-2008, 07:32 AM

but i think there is a difference in putting in an order for a certain specimen, or going to someone that had just passed on

it just seems cold to me is all

**blueback** · 04-28-2008, 10:05 PM

The kid might not be up-to-snuff genetically speaking. The general purpose of making a hot load of sperm swim up through the woman's naughty bits is to weed out the sperms that are too weak to compete. If you just grab any old sperm at random you will get a random kid. No one wants a random kid.

**Retz** · 05-01-2008, 11:32 PM

I think that would be an excellent idea. (:

Of course nothing beats genetically engineered super sperm though.

**Claptonian** · 05-02-2008, 12:02 AM

	Originally Posted by Motor Jax To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	you mean within 24 hrs? and before rigor mortis sets in?

I would think it would be easier if you waited until it's stiff....
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

**azelismia** · 05-02-2008, 01:54 AM

	Originally Posted by Motor Jax To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	you mean within 24 hrs? and before rigor mortis sets in? Motor Jax added to this post, 1 minutes and 55 seconds later... actually, that would be kinda morbid "hey, he JUST died. quick! his testicles!" and in front of the widow too?

oh, that's hiliarious. I can see it happening.

**yondyr** · 05-03-2008, 03:13 AM

	Originally Posted by Claptonian To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	I would think it would be easier if you waited until it's stiff.... To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

LOL nooo, that's taking the long way home, straight through the vas deferens would be simpler!

**EsoteriEccentri** · 05-03-2008, 04:03 AM

I don't see a problem, provided the man in question has opted to allow his sperm to be saved, and to either be donated anonymously or to someone he knows.

**Double Victory** · 05-04-2008, 05:55 PM

	Originally Posted by EsoteriEccentri To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	I don't see a problem, provided the man in question has opted to allow his sperm to be saved, and to either be donated anonymously or to someone he knows.

I was going to say the same thing. I think that harvesting the sperm under the condition that the man is an organ donor is a little misleading. There should be a second, separate option that specifically states that he is allowing his sperm to be harvested after his death. I imagine a lot of people would object to that whereas they would be fine with donating an organ, so it wouldn't really be fair to group the two together.

**vad1981** · 05-09-2008, 12:33 AM

Why would you want to harvest sperm from a dead man when there's so many live donor's around?

It's not like you're harvesting corneas or kidneys...

**ShaiGar** · 05-09-2008, 07:27 AM

Whenever I see the title of this thread I get the mental image of someone cutting off a dead guys testes, holding them upside down and shaking them until they are drained of cum.

**Motor Jax** · 05-09-2008, 07:37 AM

	Originally Posted by vad1981 To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Why would you want to harvest sperm from a dead man when there's so many live donor's around? It's not like you're harvesting corneas or kidneys...

i wouldn't mind though, just so i can spread my INFJness around

oh, and i give donations for free!

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

**ShaiGar** · 05-09-2008, 07:37 AM

	Originally Posted by Motor Jax To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	i wouldn't mind though, just so i can spread my INFJness around oh, and i give donations for free! To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Hey me too... If you're cute enough and disease free.

04-25-2008, 11:39 AM	#1
notoppings Veteran Member [53%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,128	It is possible to harvest viable sperm from a dead man for 24 hours. Do you believe that if a man signs a donor card that this also includes his sperm? (chopping off his testicles) and freezing them for later use. While living a man decides that he doesn't want to have children but after death his wife or family members can choose to preserve his sperm to insure his progeny. What are your thoughts.
notoppings is offline post a comment

04-25-2008, 11:51 AM	#2
Motor Jax Veteran Member [52%] MBTI: INFJ Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,105	you mean within 24 hrs? and before rigor mortis sets in? Motor Jax added to this post, 1 minutes and 55 seconds later... actually, that would be kinda morbid "hey, he JUST died. quick! his testicles!" and in front of the widow too?
Motor Jax is offline post a comment

04-25-2008, 12:26 PM	#4
notoppings Veteran Member [53%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,128	Yeah seems pretty gross to me. I was just wondering if you thought that his wishes to not have kids while he was alive are now void due to his death, does the surviving wife have the right to bring a child into this world absent the father and against his living wishes.
notoppings is offline post a comment

04-25-2008, 12:33 PM	#6
notoppings Veteran Member [53%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,128	Do you think that she could sue the estate for support because she has a living heir?
notoppings is offline post a comment

04-25-2008, 12:38 PM	#7
Motor Jax Veteran Member [52%] MBTI: INFJ Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,105	i wouldn't think so since it was her wish, and not the estates... probably not even her (late) husband
Motor Jax is offline post a comment

04-26-2008, 07:01 PM	#8
blueback Core Member [152%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6,114	That brings up all kinds of crazy thoughts. What if you started a business where you sell famous people's sperm? You could mug them, shove a syringe into their nuts, grab some sperm, and then disappear. Sell the sperm on the black market. . .I think you could create a whole new industry.
blueback is offline post a comment

04-28-2008, 06:33 AM	#9
PRBori Core Member [108%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 4,354	Hmmm.... Clinically extraction should take place within the first 24/hrs after death, but there have being extraction as far as 36/hrs. Although unethical, I will have to say that if the person was someone I LOVED and had never had kids... and their parents always wished to have a little one I MAY Consider it... But of course before taking such action I would have to sit down and think carefully... very carefully... for this will be a very personal decision which needs to be basedo on many aspects of my personal life. Considering also that it will be a child who will not have his father around, considering that if I do it will be my full responsability to support the child... All in all if I was in a stable financial situation at the time, and all other aspects I must consider where in place there is less than 1% chance to do so... but 99.9% is NO. That's just my personal view on the situation, of course if it actually did happen that would be a different story, but it has gone thru my mind a few times in my life for no specific reasons... except for those stories I have read Last edited by PRBori; 04-28-2008 at 07:18 AM.
PRBori is offline post a comment

04-28-2008, 07:32 AM	#12
Motor Jax Veteran Member [52%] MBTI: INFJ Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,105	but i think there is a difference in putting in an order for a certain specimen, or going to someone that had just passed on it just seems cold to me is all
Motor Jax is offline post a comment

04-28-2008, 10:05 PM	#13
blueback Core Member [152%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6,114	The kid might not be up-to-snuff genetically speaking. The general purpose of making a hot load of sperm swim up through the woman's naughty bits is to weed out the sperms that are too weak to compete. If you just grab any old sperm at random you will get a random kid. No one wants a random kid.
blueback is offline post a comment

05-01-2008, 11:32 PM	#14
Retz New Member [01%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 52	I think that would be an excellent idea. (: Of course nothing beats genetically engineered super sperm though.
Retz is offline post a comment

05-03-2008, 04:03 AM	#18
EsoteriEccentri Member [05%] MBTI: INfP Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 200	I don't see a problem, provided the man in question has opted to allow his sperm to be saved, and to either be donated anonymously or to someone he knows.
EsoteriEccentri is offline post a comment

05-09-2008, 12:33 AM	#20
vad1981 Member [07%] MBTI: intj Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 296	Why would you want to harvest sperm from a dead man when there's so many live donor's around? It's not like you're harvesting corneas or kidneys...
vad1981 is offline post a comment

05-09-2008, 07:27 AM	#21
ShaiGar Banned MBTI: ENTP Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,487	Whenever I see the title of this thread I get the mental image of someone cutting off a dead guys testes, holding them upside down and shaking them until they are drained of cum.
ShaiGar is offline post a comment