|
|
#26 |
|
Veteran Member [66%]
|
Let's see here........
Groups of Muslims fly two planes into the World Trade Centre, killing thousands. Another group of Muslims flies an aeroplane into the Pentagon, killing hundreds. Another group of Muslims attempts to fly a plane into the Capitol, is over powered by (offended) Americans, flying the plane into the ground in PA, killing all aboard. Another Muslim attempts to ignite a bomb in his shoe over the Atlantic, and is over powered by (offended) Americans. Another Muslim attempts to blow a plane out of the sky on final approach to Detroit. How on Earth could anyone be nervous or worried when flying with Muslims?!? Its quite beyond me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Core Member [246%]
MBTI: INFJ
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,844
|
I think the point is that a public figure shouldn't be using their position to spread fear
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |||
|
Core Member [283%]
|
So, should we fire Obama when he raises the threat level to Orange? That's using his position to spread fear.... |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Core Member [246%]
MBTI: INFJ
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,844
|
That is a retarded argument. There's a vast difference between a president, who has privileged knowledge of potential terror threats, passing a warning on to the people, and a radio personality saying he crosses the street when he sees a black guy coming. If Obama was to say "spiders scare the piss out of me" then that would be an equally useless statement. Irrational fears are not the same as informed warnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |||
|
Veteran Member [87%]
|
Well, exactly. If I were on a plane and knew there were people who'd spent a lot of time in Yemen, you think I wouldn't be a bit wary? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |||
|
Core Member [283%]
|
Oh, so this is coming from your personal opinion about what's "valid" and what's "invalid". |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |||
|
Veteran Member [87%]
|
It's your conclusion he was spreading fear. I don't assume that. I took it for an honest and sincere expression of something a lot of Americans feel. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |||
|
Core Member [226%]
|
That's a good idea. I'd certainly be more likely to tune in to see Juan than Parker and Spitzer. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | ||||||
|
Veteran Member [87%]
|
Today a comment like that would be a problem, because times have changed and we're not having riots and lynchings.
That's off the NPR site... |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |||
|
Core Member [246%]
MBTI: INFJ
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,844
|
I'm not saying it's necessarily bad to cross the street if you feel intimidated, or to feel nervous if you're on a plane with some suspicious looking characters (whether in your opinion that includes Muslims or not) but to use a public platform to legitimize such speech is pretty blah, in my opinion. I'm not saying we should just ignore all fears and pretend there are no divides in society, but what does a radio personality accomplish by saying "i get nervous when i see a man wearing a kufi on a plane" other than either drawing support or fire? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |||
|
Veteran Member [67%]
|
It's downright scary. Thought police, speech police and the iron hand of ridgid, lockstep ideological intolerance. Juan Williams was not fired for comments about Muslims, he was fired for not genuflecting intensly enough to the liberal left in recent years. Williams made the mistake of placing personal and professional credibility over partisan political hackery. He simply could not bring himself to stoop to the salivating, blind loyalty of the likes of Keith Olberman, Chris Mathews and Rachel Madow. He defended the left but only half-heartedly and he made too many concessions to common sense. They've wanted him gone for a long time. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |||
|
Core Member [257%]
|
a bully??? no, no, Zib. that's a complete misnomer. they're a pussy, not a bully. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |||
|
Veteran Member [87%]
|
Look at everything he said and see if that's what Williams was actually doing. It certainly doesn't sound that way to me. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | ||||||
|
Member [32%]
|
I've seen this happen a lot. All it does is cause people to just walk away and not bother having these kinds of conversations. It also causes me not to trust people who claim to be offended. Now I have to decipher if they really are (and if there's any point in trying to work things out) or if they're just trying to ruin something.
He connects with the public. Once he's made that connection with people, he has a better chance of educating them. It's far better, in my opinion, than acting like he's perfect. I don't know about everyone else here, but I don't relate to "perfect" people nor do I believe they're perfect. When I see people with no obvious character flaws, I just assume they're hiding them. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Veteran Member [80%]
|
Almost as bad as Don Imus being fired for calling some women basketball players "nappy headed hoes". Helen Thomas also got forced out of her job for saying the "Jews should get the Hell out of Palestine." If you ask me people need to get over their desire for political correctness and grow a pair. Everyone is afraid to say anything anymore because they worry about offending some group of people's feelings. I would wager that a good bit of the American populace identifies with Juan Williams's statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Veteran Member [56%]
|
My opinion on this is that he has the right to his opinion if he believes that Muslims on an airplane are something to worry about that's his right. This doesn't mean I agree with him because I don't as I tend to see individuals rather than groups. And while I will use group assumptions on occasion it is never my sole determination when judging whether someone is a threat or not.
I also believe that NPR was well within their rights to fire him for the same reason. It is their policy that such comments are inappropriate for one of their writers and they have every right to not publish material by someone who does not adhere to their principles. Also doesn't mean I agree with their principles just with their rights to determine who works for them within the confines of the law. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |||
|
Member [07%]
|
Education isn't something that Williams was doing. He was saying he feared a particular group because of a /stereotype./ He, to my knowledge, did NOTHING to help educate people about extremists vs. your everyday Muslims. He was reinforcing the American ideal of a 'dangerous arab.' |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |||
|
Veteran Member [70%]
|
This comparison is ridiculous. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | ||||||
|
Member [20%]
|
He was defending O'Reilly's statements on The View. Both of them made sure to add in the caveat that not all muslims are extremists or terrorists, but after making flimsy generalizations about muslims to justify being afraid of them. If caveats were enough to mitigate their initial statements, one could say "Not all muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are muslim" without fear of reprisal.
Without a doubt, though what happens today is typically a bit more subtle than that--avoiding interaction rather than actively displaying fear. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |||
|
Core Member [246%]
MBTI: INFJ
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,844
|
No, not even close. Imus, even if he was joking, made some comments that were in very poor taste. That's just an outright violation of broadcast standards. I don't think Williams was espousing a bigoted worldview, i just think he was careless in his description of some things. I think O'Reilly is closer to that since, as others have pointed out, he was being corrected by Williams, who clarified that not all Muslims are terrorists. The fact that Bill-O has to be reminded of this so regularly kind of disturbs me. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | ||||||
|
Core Member [229%]
|
Let's mix that up a little...
A being a common trait in B doesn't mean that B is a common trait in A -- by any definition of the word. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |||
|
Veteran Member [67%]
|
Stop trying to analyze what Williams said or determine what he meant. He was fired for not moving as far to the left as NPR.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |||
|
Core Member [189%]
|
Was he using the NPR name when he was on O'reilly's show? Was that why he was fired? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |||
|
Member [20%]
|
Could you please clarify what part of the article tells you he was fired for being too right-wing in his opinions and not, as NPR claims, because he made controversial remarks? Unless I'm mistaken, there's nothing there to support your assertion. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |||
|
Core Member [179%]
|
This is exactly what happened with Shirley Sherrod, and it turned out her comments had been edited and taken out of context. |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|