|
|
#51 | |||
|
Member [24%]
|
Well, it depends on which INTJ profile you read but there are a few out there talking about how INTJs are into good design, especially when form fits function. So it shouldn't be a huge stretch that some enjoy fashion. Enjoying fashion to me is not the same as automatically assuming the best is the most expensive, going only for brand name labels, or judging people solely based on what they wear. So with the latter in mind, I expect neatness and appropriateness from my potential mates, most of whom have been the T-shirts/ jeans casual type of guys who knows that you need to wear a suit sometimes for work/ important events. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |||
|
Member [32%]
|
Loaded in the sense that you projected "fashion-obsessed" onto INTJ females in this thread or loaded in the sense that the question was proposed to bait a particular response? |
|||
|
|
|
|
#53 | |||
|
Member [30%]
|
Since there's no brown in the shoe, I would avoid a brown belt. Black socks and black belt, or white socks should be fine. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#54 | |||||||||||||||
|
Member [03%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 136
|
This is exactly what I was trying to find out. I parsed the word stereotypical because I couldn't believe it applied to everyone. So now it was just a matter of how pervasive the apparent blandness was. I was curious because I am fond of unique, albeit functional clothing. Although I tend to stick with simple clothing, I personally have many loud shirts.
I work at a furniture store. It would be sensible to wear steel toe boots (especially after breaking a few toes), but running shoes are so much nicer; this is especially the case if you end up having to deliver. As for the neon stripe, it will most likely fade soon enough. I can get a good three months out of my shoes before having to replace them. This will most likely go down to two when I start my clinicals on top of my job. As I found out, white shoes don't do well in a warehouse setting, they soon become grey shoes from all of the dust. I might end up going back to a darker shoe.
No need to become hostile. Yes, it was baiting in a way (I did get a few hits didn't I). The term, however, was meant to be taken, sarcastically. I am focused on stereotypes after all.
Having a different preference is not what is hypocritical, holding yourself to different standard than your mate, is. Apparently this is not the case.
I believe I found the answer. No need to hijack this thread any longer. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| appearance, males |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|