Useless MBTI Stats

**Richard0612** · 03-19-2008, 02:58 PM

I thought that as we INTJs like weird statistics, I would put
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
up here. It's a collection of stats about the distribution of MBTI type according to Google hits and forums/mailing lists.
It's in MS Excel format, you can download a viewer from the MS website. I'm not going to repeat the stuff here unless you want me to.
Go forth and analyse!

**meanlittlechimp** · 03-19-2008, 03:43 PM

	Originally Posted by Richard0612 To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Go forth and analyse!

Tried to but your link takes you to megaupload and I don't see anything there that you speak of.

**qwerty** · 03-19-2008, 05:09 PM

MBTI Type Google Hits (1000s)
ISTP 51.7
ISTJ 60
ISFP 28.5
ISFJ 43.5
INTP 127
INTJ 77.2
INFP 96.1
INFJ 67.1
ESTP 42.4
ESTJ 31.2
ESFP 42.9
ESFJ 44.3
ENTP 63.6
ENTJ 50.1
ENFP 65.2
ENFJ 36.7

MBTI Type Google Hits (1000s)
ISTP 932
ISTJ 219
ISFP 120
ISFJ 140
INTP 608
INTJ 525
INFP 538
INFJ 312
ESTP 240
ESTJ 261
ESFP 107
ESFJ 92.9
ENTP 670
ENTJ 172
ENFP 250
ENFJ 146

For example:
Statistics
Es w/Mailing List 12.5 Es w/Forum 37.5
Is w/Mailing List 75 Is w/Forum 62.5
Ss w/Mailing List 25 Ss w/Forum 12.5
Ns w/Mailing List 62.5 Ns w/Forum 87.5
Ts w/Mailing List 50 Ts w/Forum 50
Fs w/Mailing List 25 Fs w/Forum 50
Ps w/Mailing List 50 Ps w/Forum 50
Js w/Mailing List 37.5 Js w/Forum 50
Types w/Mailing List 43.75 Types w/Forum 50

MBTI Type Google Hits (1000s) population
ISTP 51.7 5.4
ISTJ 60 11.6
ISFP 28.5 8.8
ISFJ 43.5 13.8
INTP 127 3.3
INTJ 77.2 2.1
INFP 96.1 4.4
INFJ 67.1 1.5
ESTP 42.4 4.3
ESTJ 31.2 8.7
ESFP 42.9 8.5
ESFJ 44.3 12.3
ENTP 63.6 3.2
ENTJ 50.1 1.8
ENFP 65.2 8.1
ENFJ 36.7 2.5
Correlation -0.39

Plus 1 or 2 graphs.

Okay they were extremely useless and misleading and in an excel spreadsheet. Maybe you should have put them in context and copied and pasted them here? I don't quite get what you were trying to do.
And by the way I would assume most people are extremely suspicious of opening excel spreadsheets as they are commonly injected with viruses. So whereas they have good use at work, there is a reason people like me don't like them on the internet.

**ElstonGunn** · 03-19-2008, 05:16 PM

	Originally Posted by meanlittlechimp To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Tried to but your link takes you to megaupload and I don't see anything there that you speak of.

Yeah, same here. So I typed "MBTI statistics" into a search engine instead.

Here are two links that I looked at for a while.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(It's in French, but I'm sure most people can figure out what "Rationnels" means.)

Interesting Stats:

-IS-Js apparently makes up about a quarter of the population.
-The distribution of introverts and extraverts is about 50-50.
-Same for Thinkers and Feelers... 50-50.

Fifty bucks and my left nut say that ESF-s make up at least half the population.

**meanlittlechimp** · 03-19-2008, 05:48 PM

ahh ok, thanks. Yeah, I've seen those.

**Richard0612** · 03-20-2008, 10:20 AM

OK, sorry. I made this a while ago and thought it may be interesting. I should really have copied the stuff over. If this thread has no usefulness/relevance maybe it should be locked [or even deleted to prevent clutter].

03-19-2008, 02:58 PM	#1
Richard0612 Member [08%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 322	I thought that as we INTJs like weird statistics, I would put To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. up here. It's a collection of stats about the distribution of MBTI type according to Google hits and forums/mailing lists. It's in MS Excel format, you can download a viewer from the MS website. I'm not going to repeat the stuff here unless you want me to. Go forth and analyse!
Richard0612 is offline post a comment

03-19-2008, 05:09 PM	#3
qwerty Member [14%] MBTI: infj Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 593	MBTI Type Google Hits (1000s) ISTP 51.7 ISTJ 60 ISFP 28.5 ISFJ 43.5 INTP 127 INTJ 77.2 INFP 96.1 INFJ 67.1 ESTP 42.4 ESTJ 31.2 ESFP 42.9 ESFJ 44.3 ENTP 63.6 ENTJ 50.1 ENFP 65.2 ENFJ 36.7 MBTI Type Google Hits (1000s) ISTP 932 ISTJ 219 ISFP 120 ISFJ 140 INTP 608 INTJ 525 INFP 538 INFJ 312 ESTP 240 ESTJ 261 ESFP 107 ESFJ 92.9 ENTP 670 ENTJ 172 ENFP 250 ENFJ 146 For example: Statistics Es w/Mailing List 12.5 Es w/Forum 37.5 Is w/Mailing List 75 Is w/Forum 62.5 Ss w/Mailing List 25 Ss w/Forum 12.5 Ns w/Mailing List 62.5 Ns w/Forum 87.5 Ts w/Mailing List 50 Ts w/Forum 50 Fs w/Mailing List 25 Fs w/Forum 50 Ps w/Mailing List 50 Ps w/Forum 50 Js w/Mailing List 37.5 Js w/Forum 50 Types w/Mailing List 43.75 Types w/Forum 50 MBTI Type Google Hits (1000s) population ISTP 51.7 5.4 ISTJ 60 11.6 ISFP 28.5 8.8 ISFJ 43.5 13.8 INTP 127 3.3 INTJ 77.2 2.1 INFP 96.1 4.4 INFJ 67.1 1.5 ESTP 42.4 4.3 ESTJ 31.2 8.7 ESFP 42.9 8.5 ESFJ 44.3 12.3 ENTP 63.6 3.2 ENTJ 50.1 1.8 ENFP 65.2 8.1 ENFJ 36.7 2.5 Correlation -0.39 Plus 1 or 2 graphs. Okay they were extremely useless and misleading and in an excel spreadsheet. Maybe you should have put them in context and copied and pasted them here? I don't quite get what you were trying to do. And by the way I would assume most people are extremely suspicious of opening excel spreadsheets as they are commonly injected with viruses. So whereas they have good use at work, there is a reason people like me don't like them on the internet.
qwerty is offline post a comment

03-19-2008, 05:48 PM	#5
meanlittlechimp Member [13%] MBTI: ENTP Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 539	ahh ok, thanks. Yeah, I've seen those.
meanlittlechimp is offline post a comment

03-20-2008, 10:20 AM	#6
Richard0612 Member [08%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 322	OK, sorry. I made this a while ago and thought it may be interesting. I should really have copied the stuff over. If this thread has no usefulness/relevance maybe it should be locked [or even deleted to prevent clutter].
Richard0612 is offline post a comment