|
|
#251 | |||
|
Member [41%]
|
The words "self-fulfilling prophecy" occur to me on reading this at first blush.
---------- Post added 12-05-2009 at 07:38 PM ----------
Ok, having spent years in martial arts, with many women and having helped train women in self-defense, I can tell you that this statement is 100% false. Your body-language tells the potential attacker everything about whether or not you'd make a good target. Stand tall and confident, and you significantly cut down your chance of attack. Slump, look uncertain, and give off a general sense of lack-of-confidence, and the attacker will know you make a successful target for them. Note, that this applies to men as much as women in cases like muggings. The only thing a predator fears is another predator. It really comes down to common sense. Know the area and potential threat of the area you're going to. Above and beyond that, learn to size people up quickly and trust your gut about people. This shit's not complicated....
Last edited by firebee; 12-05-2009 at 06:46 PM.
Reason: spoilerified huge quote
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Veteran Member [66%]
|
can't help but notice none of those tips use aikido.
"this shit's not complicated." be aware, be paranoid, but don't freak out if a nice guy smiles at you. contradictory, no? women - it's your responsibility to live in constant awareness (ie., fear) that you could be attacked at any time... but it's unfair for men to have to be aware that you feel that way. women, be prepared for the fact that you might end up in the trunk of a car someday... and remember, being the cause of a crash is better on balance for society than for society to find your body in a remote location. i'll try to take society in consideration next time i'm threatened. oh and that nice guy who just wants a date. i think it is odd that many of the same men who will get offended at the notion that they be aware and act in a manner consistent with showing sensitivity to this awareness, will also be the same men preaching taking self-defense, and practicing houdini methods of escape. |
|
|
|
|
|
#253 | |||
|
Administrator
|
What I'm offended by is the idea that it's my responsibility to be thinking about this when I'm just doing my own thing. The sidewalk example again: I'm a pretty oblivious person; if I'm walking on a sidewalk at night, the fact that there is a lone woman walking near me will probably not even register. Nor should it be my responsibility to register it, unless it is my intent to interact with her. Hence my assertion that she should cross the street if I make her uncomfortable, rather than expecting me to a) be aware of her potential discomfort and b) cross the street myself. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#254 |
|
Core Member [257%]
|
Firebrand, you can't talk 'personal responsibility' to some people. they don't understand that wolves look for weak animals to eat; it escapes their mechanisms; they think the world should be safe, like their fantasies.
i'm male; it's not about penises. some of y'all are female, it's not about vaginas. if i saw gloria steinem getting raped, i would not intervene. she's liberated, and deserves the same treatment i would afford a man. besides, i think she is against concealed carry....so that's two reasons i would not intervene. the less of her there are around, the better i like it. is it any wonder i don't want to deal with women who have a bucketful of reasons why this world should be other than it really is? carry a knife, be aware at all times. the cops aren't going to help you. you have to help yourself. i watch my hairy white ass all the time; if you can't watch your own, then maybe you ought not go anywhere except with a dozen body guards trained in martial arts. i accept that 'shit can happen'; i don't like it, i might whine about it if it does, but it's a harsh world. deal with it, or hide under the couch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#255 | |||
|
Veteran Member [66%]
|
yep. i get it. and i don't blame you for feeling that way... a lot of guys feel the same way. but some of the same group of guys will think it is a woman's responsibility, while they are going about their own thing living their life, to be sure to know how to break out a taillight when thrown into the trunk of a car. i mean, somehow, that's just common sense ! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#256 | |||
|
Member [24%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 999
|
Last edited by firebee; 12-05-2009 at 06:47 PM.
Reason: spoilerified quote of huge quote
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
Core Member [1340%]
|
Zig zag patterns are too predictable...its like shooting ducks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#258 | |||
|
Administrator
|
I certainly don't think it's a woman's responsibility to know these things, but I think it's wise for anyone to know them, because of the sad fact that there are very nasty people in the world. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#259 | |||||||||||||||
|
Core Member [662%]
|
Zsych, yes, I am female. I also have a second-degree Dan in Kendo, with a few minor apprenticeships in the more contact sports, and am a California Armed Guard. Ability to defend one's self does not mean a guaranteed successful defense.
One out of every six women will be sexually assaulted. One out of every 2.5 women will have an abortion. These are sexually traumatizing experiences. You just wrote off a large portion of the population. I am part of that population. Let's see if I can turn this around: "Seriously, we don't NEED priviledged white males who offhandedly insult entire races, genders, and assaulted women groups. Our lives would be just as good without ever talking to them. Probably better." If you're not a (relatively young) white male, please accept my apology. I've never seen any other gender/race combo so offhandedly spout off something like
Hm. Better: if you have six or more women in your family, one of them was likely assaulted because she didn't come with XY secondary characteristics. Blood, swelling, pain, tears. But, yeah, you don't need those women. Right?
Won't matter to a group of attackers, nor someone hyped up on drugs. And about "only rapists can stop rape": I have found three people -- two women, one man -- dead of suicide when they could not stop their rape. One of them was... bad. It took five days to clean away. All of them had been chastised for 'not doing enough' and 'maybe you really wanted it, you dirty $!#&." Where people want to learn to defend themselves, they do. When they are attacked, they fight back. When they are overwhelmed by the common crushing depression, "you didn't do enough, it's your fault" is the only logical correlation to a traumatized mind. And then they find the moproom in the back and kill themselves. 'only rapists can stop rape' keeps them from blaming themselves (we saved a few with that mantra, after we learned the lesson) and doesn't keep those who wish to, from learning how to defend themselves.
Double standards. Women must be constantly open to all men, never closed, but able to help themselves if attacked because they are alone on this one, baby.
Yeah, this is why one acts the same everywhere. In the big city, in a bar, on a crowded street, in a store, every location: no modification is necessary.
Well |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#260 | |||
|
Administrator
|
I'm afraid I don't understand your point. Of course one acts differently in different places. However, if I were to go into the worst part of Philadelphia (which I have not yet done,) and I were afraid of each person I saw being a potential mugger, it would not be their moral responsibility to maintain distance from me, but rather my responsibility to maintain distance from them, if that is what I desired. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#261 |
|
Core Member [117%]
|
Second google result for "This e-mail should probably be taken seriously because the Crying Baby Theory was mentioned on America 's Most Wanted when they profiled the serial killer in Louisiana":
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Remember, kids, if a serial killer ever stuffs you in the cargo area of an first-generation Ford Explorer, the liftgate may be disassembled through the following procedure:
Of course, this assumes that you were not strangled to death with your own overalls first. |
|
|
|
|
|
#262 |
|
Veteran Member [66%]
|
if someone has a gun, make sure you do too. there's little point in having a knife, if you don't have the strength to wield it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#263 | |||
|
Member [04%]
|
It's different to talk to you than to talk with a victim so it may be difficult for you to understand some of the feelings. I also want to be clear that suppressing feelings or having them magically go away is not an option for healing. I can still clearly remember the feelings I had at that time. Now I'll try to explain to you what did help and why I do not live in fear now. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#264 | ||||||
|
Core Member [148%]
|
Or tied up or drugged.
Surely you're not an advocate of NRA's wet dream of ensuring universal courtesy by arming every American? |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#265 | |||||||||
|
Core Member [117%]
|
Or having had one's Achilles tendons severed by a razor-blade-wielding rapist who is flat enough to fit underneath a compact car. We must by all means enumerate a list of one-off strategies to deal with the latest oddly specific rapist-tactic that arrives in our inbox. It makes us feel safer.
Indeed. Useless as they are, why is it that people continue to use the silly things? It's a better idea to have a knife open and in your hand at all times, so that you don't have to worry about fishing out your weapon when the time comes to gut someone. Which happens often.
Personally, I am all about carrying around a weapon that hardly anyone (including myself) knows how to wield. Of course, I assume by "discourage" you mean "exsanguinate", since one of the few things I know about kniveses is that the one that your opponent sees is being held by an idiot. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#266 | |||||||||
|
Core Member [148%]
|
Yup - just like those ancient chain emails advising women to wear their hair short and wear clothing that would be difficult to cut off.
My point was that a knife is far easier to carry in your pocket. If the situation in question calls for vigilance, all you have to do is keep your hand in the pocket. If/when something happens, the knife is ready to use in less than a second.
Like you said, it makes us feel safer. Illogical though it may be, in the end it's all about perceptions. Sure, it would be great if you could call a time-out, reach in your purse for your S&W, aim for the kneecaps and yell "okay, go!" but in the absence of that, any sort of weapon in your hand - even a knife - could scare off some of the attackers. Of course, if the attacker in question is a 300lb gorilla in a drug-induced rage, the victim has little - if any - chance... |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#267 |
|
Member [33%]
|
If you have any weapon you had better be damn well ready to use it if the situation calls for it. That's what I've learned. Don't escalate with a weapon until you're going to use it. Personally I keep a survival knife in my truck and if there's ever a situation where it'd be necessary to use it, I wouldn't hesitate.
This should not be an issue that women have to even worry about, but it's not possible until this behavior is stopped, and going off of trends that doesn't seem likely. I can only influence my grid square, my own behavior and other people around me depending on my location. I avoid people at night as well, it just isn't worth the risk. In fact, I've had a co-worker jumped by 6 guys and he was hospitalized for several broken bones. It comes down to where you live and what it takes for you to be comfortable living there. I'd go pick something up from a store around here at night, but I definitely wouldn't be walking around. |
|
|
|
|
|
#268 | |||
|
Member [15%]
|
Most cars have a cable running from the left side of the drivers side seat to the clasp on the trunk. One need only remove the plastic/fabric covering the clasp (most cars I've seen you can just rip it off) and pull on the cable to release the trunk clasp. Of course if you've been tied up and cannot get free the ease with which most trunks can be opened is quite irrelevant. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#269 | |||
|
Member [09%]
|
Seems like a lot to remember in a time of sheer terror. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#270 | |||
|
Member [15%]
|
I think you missed the second camp. Not only do they state that rapes happen and that it is not the fault of the woman, but usually tack on "that rape is the failure of the rapist" or something similar. The problem with this is that it assumes that rapists are just supposed to regulate themselves or that society is supposed to train all young boys/men that rape is wrong; no means no etc. They assume that rape is purely an issue ego and male entitlement created by a society that pushes this ideal of the "assertive male" who brings home the bacon. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#271 | |||
|
Core Member [496%]
|
If they wanted to approach you in order to befriend you or get to know you better it would behoove them to do so in a non threatening manner otherwise you could possibly consider them a threat. Which would be counterproductive to their goal. The point of this thread initially IMO was to just give men a heads up that it might behoove them as well to consider how they are approaching a woman if they want to actually find her receptive. (behoove is my word for the day. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#272 |
|
Core Member [257%]
|
Irish, i don't have a prevention paradox. rape among 'civilized humans' is wrong. education is wonderful; prevention is wonderful; being alert is wonderful. however, there will still be some who wish to rape, which is mostly about 'control issues' from what i've read....
therefore, get rid of the 'rape' gene. the simplest way is to immediately kill proven rapers. kill them before they can pass on their genes, if possible. part of the problem is...like wine on the carpet...it will be impossible to get rid of all the 'rape' dna, most likely. hope the 'animal' metaphor works for you...there are evidently a lot of posters in this thread who disagree that humans have any commonality to animals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#273 | |||
|
Member [04%]
|
It's difficult to react to "go too far" because I don't know if this refers to actions that are non-threatening which are being perceived as threatening by someone who still needs to heal or if it actually means taking something that is perceived as non-threatening to legitimately cross a line. The first scenario is probably most likely to occur in someone who has not realistically faced what happened to them. The second is most likely to occur because of a lack of empathy in the person who thinks their actions are harmless. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#274 | |||
|
Core Member [662%]
|
Yes. Everyone acts differently because we must be able to live together. It is out of deference to others that I meet eyes on the way to work *eyeroll*. So our behaviour is shaped by the surrounding environs and people. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#275 | |||
|
Member [03%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 141
|
It's obvious you have no experience in defensive tactics with firearms by making up a bunch of nonsense about it. With a bit of training and a fair amount of practice one can draw from concealment, aim in on a target at 7 yards, put three rounds in the chest -- all in under 2 seconds. I'd hardly consider that "quite a while". And at shorter range it's even faster. |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|