[SelfMadeBum]

40/44

[ArtistTyrant]

33/44. The test seemed to overly generalize ideas though.

[Paul Siraisi]

35/44, and I don't think I saw a single justifying statement I completely agreed with in the whole test.

[PeterIMC]

Results

You scored 21.5 out of a total of 44.

My Results

Your score suggests that you treat social ethics and behaviour as a matter of pragmatic deals or exchanges. One helps a friend who has done you favours because he or she may return the favour.

You are likely to appeal for "tit-for-tat" exchanges or deals with others; even legal justice may be seen in this way. You will generally emphasise an approach to others based upon strict equalities (or inequalities), appealing to unfettered or unlimited freedoms as concrete rights, for example not helping others because "you shouldn't stick your nose in someone else's business."

Your reasoning is likely to depend upon your own preferences or needs at a particular time. You may also decide upon issues in terms of the advantages or disadvantages to be gained from action.

--------------


If I'm really honest, I think many people with these high scores (Almost all of you) have been answering in a "trying to look better than I am" fashion. This test is also kind of helping you a lot to get to do that, I have to say.

I think I got the lowest score,..
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
But the description actually makes perfect sense to me.

[nettneu]

I got 38 too. Which is crazy because I certainly wouldn't claim to be moral. In fact I'm not even sure that the concept of morality is particularly useful, because it means different things to different people.

It seems that the person who defined the tests thinks that the way I tend to behave is rather "moral". Maybe that means his "morality" is a fairly rational way to behave. Or maybe it's just coincidence, because I don't feel that the test succeeded in really finding out what I think. In many cases none of suggested "reasons" was the real one. And I wasn't at all sure about how to calibrate the categories "very important", "important" and "not important" in the first place.

The results say, "Conformity to ethical norms is important to you." But it isn't, I'm not remotely interested in conformity for its own sake.





nettneu added to this post, 37 minutes and 43 seconds later...

	Originally Posted by Figmentum To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	It's a different test, but from the same site. I'm a Pastel abstract artist, so this test interested me more. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

That one said, "Your favourite type of art is Japanese ukiyo-e."

Well, I do like that a lot, but if I had to choose a single favourite type it would probably be renaissance landscapes. Or something surrealist, especially Magritte. Or Jerome Bosch. The test went on to say that from the personality questions it would expect me to like impressionism - which I do to some extent, but only in its milder forms (e.g. Monet's earlier waterlillies are nice, but in the end he took it a bit too far.)

[Dragontongue]

33.5

[Zombicide]

34.5

[ToyBox01]

Results

You scored 41 out of a total of 44.

Audience's Scores
1 % 1 % 32 % 66 %

0-11 12-22 23-33 34-44

ENFP
2w3

[Functianalyst]

Results
You scored 33 out of a total of 44.

0-11 12-22 23-33 34-44

Your score puts you in the mature category of social reasoning and the majority of people will have scores in this range. Thinking here transcends the practicalities of one's preferences and exchanges to an emphasis upon social feeling, caring and conduct.

You take into account the consequences of actions for other people, whether for benefit or harm, as a consideration in its own right for deciding how one should act towards others. You emphasise relationships, thinking how you might feel if you were on the receiving end. Empathy is important, as well as compassion.

You are likely to expect others to conform to normally expected conduct, reflecting on "common decency" and will think of the chaos caused by laws being broken. You will value, love and respect others, and appreciate some higher values, as well as speaking of the benefits of a clean conscience or pride.

[Nemesis]

Results

You scored 40.5 out of a total of 44.
Audience's Scores
1 % 1 % 32 % 66 %

0-11 12-22 23-33 34-44
My Results

Your score puts you in the highest category of social reasoning. You will see ethical and moral values as important to the needs of society and will appeal to basic rights or values. You might say "Honesty is a standard which everyone should accept" or "Life is sacred."

Conformity to ethical norms is important to you, in terms of a responsibility, obligation or commitment for all individuals, although you may be willing to consider exceptions in some particular circumstances. You are likely to suggest that with entitlement or privilege comes responsibility.

You will appeal to considerations of responsible character or integrity in others, preferring a consistent or standard practice of behaviour in order to avoid damage to social institutions such as the legal system.

However, you will want to see an adjusted case-by-case application of standards for the sake of fairness to all people. Lastly, you are very likely to appeal to standards of individual or personal conscience, as well as of honour, dignity or integrity.
Background

Scores on the questionnaire form a scale that tracks the development of reasoning from childhood through to adulthood about social, ethical and moral issues. The original research using this questionnaire was conducted in the United States by Kohlberg and was followed up by John Gibbs, Karen Basinger and Dick Fuller.

Most children make decisions based on the influence of power and authority figures, progressing through an emphasis upon exchange relationships with others, then on to mutual and social expectations.

Some people progress to a level where they base their moral reasoning on universal values. Others become fixed at earlier stages depending upon circumstances. But recent research has suggested that it is possible to change the way you reason about your social responsibilities.

[Josh Young]

34.5/44

You are likely to expect others to conform to normally expected conduct, reflecting on "common decency" and will think of the chaos caused by laws being broken. You will value, love and respect others, and appreciate some higher values, as well as speaking of the benefits of a clean conscience or pride
Wow... way off.
Chaos has no relation to law to me.
Normal conduct is deplorable to me.
Pride is worthless to me.
Speaking of a clean conscience doesn't mean a thing, having one matters.

[Aristocrat Porn]

You scored 29 out of a total of 44.



This test is bollocks.

[Kris]

40.5/44

Higher than I expected, as my morals are based on internal reasoning rather than accepted conventions & I don't have a whole lot of personal respect for laws.

[lamplighter]

You scored 37.5 out of a total of 44.

Morality is subjective though.

[hongi]

40/44

[nuloki]

Psychology tests

Results

You scored 40 out of a total of 44.
Audience's Scores
1 % 1 % 32 % 66 %

0-11 12-22 23-33 34-44

That was a fascinating little quiz. Thanks Paul V, that was stimulating

[athenian200]

My Results You scored 27.5 out of a total of 44. Your score puts you in the mature category of social reasoning and the majority of people will have scores in this range. Thinking here transcends the practicalities of one's preferences and exchanges to an emphasis upon social feeling, caring and conduct. You take into account the consequences of actions for other people, whether for benefit or harm, as a consideration in its own right for deciding how one should act towards others. You emphasise relationships, thinking how you might feel if you were on the receiving end. Empathy is important, as well as compassion. You are likely to expect others to conform to normally expected conduct, reflecting on "common decency" and will think of the chaos caused by laws being broken. You will value, love and respect others, and appreciate some higher values, as well as speaking of the benefits of a clean conscience or pride.

Heck, I'm an INFJ, and I'm not as moral as you. And a lot of people think I'm very "stuck up" in many ways. Try to calm down about it, it must be stressing you out.

[MikeAZ]

mature

Not a well writen test or an accurate assessment.

[gg00se]

I enjoyed that. Reinforced a difficult decision I had to make this week when I resigned from my job - thanks.


You scored 42 out of a total of 44.
Audience's Scores
1 % 1 % 32 % 66 %

0-11 12-22 23-33 34-44
My Results

Your score puts you in the highest category of social reasoning. You will see ethical and moral values as important to the needs of society and will appeal to basic rights or values. You might say "Honesty is a standard which everyone should accept" or "Life is sacred."

Conformity to ethical norms is important to you, in terms of a responsibility, obligation or commitment for all individuals, although you may be willing to consider exceptions in some particular circumstances. You are likely to suggest that with entitlement or privilege comes responsibility.

You will appeal to considerations of responsible character or integrity in others, preferring a consistent or standard practice of behaviour in order to avoid damage to social institutions such as the legal system.

However, you will want to see an adjusted case-by-case application of standards for the sake of fairness to all people. Lastly, you are very likely to appeal to standards of individual or personal conscience, as well as of honour, dignity or integrity.

[ErikNikolai]

41.5.

[TheOverman]

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Results You scored 35.5 out of a total of 44. Audience's Scores 1 % 1 % 32 % 66 % 0-11 12-22 23-33 34-44 My Results Your score puts you in the mature category of social reasoning and the majority of people will have scores in this range. Thinking here transcends the practicalities of one's preferences and exchanges to an emphasis upon social feeling, caring and conduct. You take into account the consequences of actions for other people, whether for benefit or harm, as a consideration in its own right for deciding how one should act towards others. You emphasise relationships, thinking how you might feel if you were on the receiving end. Empathy is important, as well as compassion. You are likely to expect others to conform to normally expected conduct, reflecting on "common decency" and will think of the chaos caused by laws being broken. You will value, love and respect others, and appreciate some higher values, as well as speaking of the benefits of a clean conscience or pride. Background Scores on the questionnaire form a scale that tracks the development of reasoning from childhood through to adulthood about social, ethical and moral issues. The original research using this questionnaire was conducted in the United States by Kohlberg and was followed up by John Gibbs, Karen Basinger and Dick Fuller. Most children make decisions based on the influence of power and authority figures, progressing through an emphasis upon exchange relationships with others, then on to mutual and social expectations. Some people progress to a level where they base their moral reasoning on universal values. Others become fixed at earlier stages depending upon circumstances. But recent research has suggested that it is possible to change the way you reason about your social responsibilities.

[NoGrayArea01]

You scored 39 out of a total of 44. Your score puts you in the highest category of social reasoning. You will see ethical and moral values as important to the needs of society and will appeal to basic rights or values. You might say "Honesty is a standard which everyone should accept" or "Life is sacred." Conformity to ethical norms is important to you, in terms of a responsibility, obligation or commitment for all individuals, although you may be willing to consider exceptions in some particular circumstances. You are likely to suggest that with entitlement or privilege comes responsibility. You will appeal to considerations of responsible character or integrity in others, preferring a consistent or standard practice of behaviour in order to avoid damage to social institutions such as the legal system. However, you will want to see an adjusted case-by-case application of standards for the sake of fairness to all people. Lastly, you are very likely to appeal to standards of individual or personal conscience, as well as of honour, dignity or integrity.

[Ytterbium]

36 of 44.

[crabnebula]

34.5

[Taryuna]

40.5