|
|
#1 |
|
Member [02%]
MBTI: INTX
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 117
|
I believe quite a few universities are already providing services via the iPhone or iPod Touch.
And since I live in the United States, I'm using our college/university systems here as my frame of reference. There has been a discussion of the Kindle 2 in another thread on this forum. Could you use the combination of a Kindle 2, now selling for $300.00, the low-end iPod Touch, and a netbook, as a delivery system for a nearly free college education? Other than the cost of these tech devices, blank notebooks and pens, etc.? Perhaps the initial degree for such a system could be a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, with a minor in business entrepreneurship, or vice versa. You would have to recruit retired professors to develop course content, which would be delivered via the Kindle 2, the iPhone or iPod, or the netbook. Textbooks on the Kindle 2, audio lectures and some videos on the iPod, and other videos plus simulations on the netbook. It would also be necessary to find other volunteers to supervise the exams the students take after completing one course, and perhaps a comprehensive final exam when they have completed their studies. The most difficult task would be achieving the exact same accreditation of the program as the colleges and universities receive here in the U.S. So would this be possible now, or is it nothing more than a pipedream? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Core Member [162%]
MBTI: INTP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,493
|
You don't even need tech, just the desire to learn. I recall the story of a patent examiner who did quite well in physics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Core Member [162%]
|
Oh, you mean
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Core Member [407%]
|
You can get the material free now. With technology, you can get lots of the instruction free... now.
What you won't get free is the credential (i.e., diploma, certificate, degree) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Core Member [113%]
|
Interesting, RBM. I didn't know that person. When I first read thod's comment, however, Albert Einstein immediately came to my mind. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
Core Member [162%]
|
Did you catch my smiley face ? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member [01%]
|
That would lead us even closer to the society of 'Man As Machine'. The Human Robot Age?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member [36%]
|
MIT has classes online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New Member [01%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
|
As does UC Berkeley
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member [01%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
|
The UK has the Open University (open to non UK residents) that was setup by the UK government in 1969. You can complete courses at bachelors, masters, and PhD level from home, with only having to show up someplace to take the exams.
As has always been the case you can self-educate, and the range of downloadable lectures and such available now provides guided learning and convienence. The problem, as noted in the OP, is getting some form of accreditation for your learning. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member [08%]
|
While the course being able to be produced nearly free does have the chance of reducing prices, the thing about the large majority of fees is all the personnel costs and such. The retired professors will expect to be paid for their input and such.
Ultimately, educators will prefer to earn money than otherwise. While this may cut costs, I think we'll probably still end up with something that people will have to pay for. Economics - when quantity supplied > quantity demanded, the price will fall, and vice-versa. Here, the quantity supplied of such education will be small at its inception, and the quantity demanded will be high, forcing prices upward. Should you wish to pursue this option for education, it will be best done by a sector independent of market forces, say, the government. Which may not care, so... whatever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 194
|
A secondary purpose of college is to waste peoples' time and energy with the exception of those who are going for doctorates or Master's degrees. The current primary purpose of college is to get people enslaved to debt as early in their working lives as possible so they spend the next 10 years in abject misery, paying off debts that will haunt them for the rest of their lives even after they're paid off (due to the damage already done). Even if college was free or nearly free, it would still be a waste of time and energy since college education becomes obsolete within two years after graduation (again, with the exception of doctorates and other such degrees). The whole purpose of this college system is to cultivate perpetual obsolescence so no one ever ends up making too much money (by the system's standards).
The system doesn't want anyone with anything less than a Bachelor's making more than $350 for a 40-hour workweek. The system doesn't want anyone with anything less than a Master's making more than $450 a week. Those who find a way out of or around these confines are flukes who've somehow figured out a way to live free from the system's boundaries or have circumvented the system's rules in some way. The purpose of law is to enforce social darwinism. The purpose of order is to limit human potential. Different ideologies and different forms of social order (socialism, fascism, globalism, etc.) are merely different versions of the same concept -- control of peoples' minds and actions through state- or socially-enforced mediocrity and futility. More often than not, college is just another functionary of this machine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member [08%]
|
Society is extremely difficult to control if people's abilities are not restricted in some way.
If a small detachment of 100 high-level INTJs are injected into any large social group (government, college, business, whatever) at a decision-making level, the entire structure will turn inside out. That would utterly screw the ESTJs currently in charge. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||||||||
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 194
|
It's not peoples' abilities that need to be controlled. Only cruelty and ruthlessness. And "control" isn't the right word. I prefer the terms "punish" or "destroy."
Sounds fun to me.
Let's turn them screws, yo! |
|||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|