[Distance]

I've yet to figure out what 'good at sex' means beyond not boring.

[KeepItReal]

	Originally Posted by Yuri To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Nope. It depends on the man's self-confidence. Being cocky is a clear sign of insecurities (and probably bad sex skills), though.

Incorrect.
Being cocky is a sign of self-confidence.
Self-confidence is highly attractive to women so these guys get laid often.
Getting laid often gives a man much greater experience.
Greater experience usually develops in to good sex skills.

[IotaNull]

ITT: Women answer that no, they do not make this assumption, and if anything make the opposite assumption. Men then respond with baseless conjecture that women do make this assumption and that the assumption is correct, in most cases with the apparent intention of rationalising that they're so good at sex that it shines through by just how amazingly hot they are.

[Hariar]

If you substitute "good at sex" with "feel good to have sex with", maybe you are onto something. At least that should be the correct male counterpart of this potential phenomena.

[Sethis]

	Originally Posted by Mogura To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Hell, I know a lot of guys that automatically assume that if a chick is hot then she must be great in the sack.* I wonder if women have the same line of thinking...

Well for one they should have some greater experience at it.

	Originally Posted by Distance To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	I've yet to figure out what 'good at sex' means beyond not boring.

+infinity

[Distance]

	Originally Posted by Sethis To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Well for one they should have some greater experience at it. +infinity

Good is honestly subjective when it comes to sex. What one person calls 'good', another might not be turned on. Let's take a screamer. Some are grossed out or annoyed by it, others find it erotic.

[Nemesis]

Like a few have mentioned already, I don't think there's a really well-defined universal "good" here. There's so much variability in what gets people off that the key is really being responsive to what those unique things may be. More compatibility than skill. Of course, experience can help someone learn to be more responsive, but I don't think it's necessary.

For the most part, I think that people who click extremely well with one another will probably have a satisfying sex-life regardless of their relative experience or history. Being in-tune outside of the sack often translates into being in-tune in the sack, provided they feel highly comfortable with one another. However, a drastic difference in experience will likely yield less compatibility. With experience comes knowing exactly what gets you off. A partner who is clueless about what really gets them off is not often someone whose world you can rock.

[katatonic]

Originally Posted by Nemesis To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Like a few have mentioned already, I don't think there's a really well-defined universal "good" here. There's so much variability in what gets people off that the key is really being responsive to what those unique things may be. More compatibility than skill. Of course, experience can help someone learn to be more responsive, but I don't think it's necessary. For the most part, I think that people who click extremely well with one another will probably have a satisfying sex-life regardless of their relative experience or history. Being in-tune outside of the sack often translates into being in-tune in the sack, provided they feel highly comfortable with one another. However, a drastic difference in experience will likely yield less compatibility. With experience comes knowing exactly what gets you off. A partner who is clueless about what really gets them off is not often someone whose world you can rock.

I agree with all of this but the last part. Unless they don't know what gets them off and are not willing to explore it. Then I would agree.

[Shadeylark]

	Originally Posted by Citroen To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Absolutely not. Blast. Where in the heck do we bring feeling/connection into this or are we just talking about primal needs?

for some us sex can be just sex... feelings/connection can be irrelevant at times depending on mood.

after all, there's a reason most people distinguish between making love and fucking.

[Marcus Septim]

	Originally Posted by Uber10 To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Just like shoes, if she wants them she does not care if it hurt her feet

lol good point,but she only gonna wear them once!