|
|
#26 |
|
Core Member [110%]
|
I was never much of a pickup artist. I didn't mind spending a long time getting to know a person before hanging out as friends.
And even when I finally took the shot at going home, I didn't use any lines. I was just there at closing time and asked if they would like to sleep at my place. (Which meant fuck then sleep.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | ||||||
|
New Member [01%]
|
Thanks for the feedback it's good to hear a negative story about someone who's actually tried. I'll definitely look into the Mark Manson material.
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |||
|
Core Member [151%]
|
"Gaining self-confidence by any other name..." I guess. That's ultimately a good thing, whether it be for dating, your career, or any aspect of your life. Keep at it, I say. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Veteran Member [73%]
|
I've read some material. It's not recommended to follow the guidelines too much. Most of tactics will attract the wrong kind of women. It does have useful tidbits of information though, and it definitely has entertainment value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||||||
|
Member [33%]
|
You know it.
I have a program for you to follow, OP. It's amazing! You should try it! It will help change your life. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Core Member [410%]
|
Any woman dumb enough to fall for PUA, is 40 bricks short of a load. If you're looking for a bimbette or emotionally retarded woman, live it, learn it, love it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Member [22%]
|
Personally i'm still waiting for the "how to attract an emotionally stable, non-crazy, high self esteem woman" guide from someone around here, but most people around here just seem to repeat the nonsensical "be yourself" crap and throw rocks at anything else.
PUA itself is still basically crap. Negs and "high value" baloney something or other, making up dumb stories about how wildly successful you and other variously crazy ideas that they think "work". Read the pua lingo site thingy for about 5 minutes, giggle at the idiocy, and then keep looking for real substance in dating advice until you find something that clicks with you mentally, and that your intuition can agree with. It should be obvious that being an outright asshole does not create successful longterm relationships. I personally spent a few months rummaging through PUA type advice trying to find answers, specifically through David DeAngelo's stuff, found it be confusing and not specific or detailed enough to actually provide answers, and moved through it along with most of the rest of "normal" PUA type advice, the stuff that thinks negs and randomly being an asshole are attractive to woman. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |||
|
Core Member [110%]
|
You were trying to find the answers to exactly what questions? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |||
|
Member [22%]
|
"What do women want?", why does a woman choose one man over another, and the 50 bazillion other odd questions that need to be addressed in order to be any sense of balance or "logic" to the idea of relationships. PUA answered just about zero of these, and most of them just continued to play off the "women are illogical, your success will be random luck. But here, buy my book for $59.99 and i'll tell you things that work occasionally even though women are still random crazy". |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Veteran Member [59%]
|
The principles behind PUA work on everybody, its observations of human nature, men women there really is little difference in their core nature.
PUA is applied social dynamics, there are few fields that cover it in such depth, with oh so much data. There is no force that man can wield more powerful then the ability to work a room, and there is no greater driving force to innovation then mans desire to get into some chicks pants. It just so happens that like every field the focus of the masses is misguided in the pursuit of the crude. I dont let preconceptions get in the way of my explorations, and I dont define myself by any piece of knowledge. I've never paid a dime for anybody’s PUA book, I use youtube and forums. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Banned
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,268
|
What is the difference between "social skills" and "social manipulation"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Member [10%]
|
NeverPhased, thanks for starting this thread. And thanks for all the links that were suggested.
About 5 years ago one of my friends handed me a copy of The Game. He got really into it, developing routines and going out every night. I went as his wingman sometimes. It was uncomfortable, because I would have to lie. (Eg, I'd be the guy who got a drunken text from his girlfriend saying she loved him for the first time. "Ladies, what does that mean?") Still, I can't complain too much, because I ended up talking to tons of people, and it was really fun. As far as I know, he got lots of digits but never actually scored. Then, he met a woman not using game and now they are happily married. Who knows, maybe game gave him the confidence he needed. As for me, I've read maybe a half-dozen books on social dynamics and such. I'm more aware of my appearance (eg, grooming, physique, body language, voice) and the importance of having good stories ready. But I gave up on being a PUA. Instead, I started taking dancing lessons and have found other ways to meet girls (eg, online, where my excellent writing skills shine through). Besides, my trouble has never been attracting women, it's keeping them. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. I guess what I'm saying is that I want to encourage you down the path to becoming a PUA. Get out there and meet some ladies! Just make sure to report back. With pictures, preferably! |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |||
|
New Member [01%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31
|
I have the book right here, and I believe at the very end, the lesson was that the same that the computer learnt in WarGames, the only way to win is not to play at all. For a book about the PUA, and all the scoring that went on, yeah, you do end up scoring a lot, but you don't have that emotional attachment. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |||
|
Suspended
MBTI: ENTJ
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,572
|
Much of PUA is pseudo-psychology.
The Alpha Male concept is key though. Despite modern society decrying gender roles and bases, I think women naturally are geared towards the assured provider type. Anthropologists studying hunter-gatherers in Africa have shown that in such societies, males are chosen on their provision skills and ability to lead. it's something clearly ingrained, despite what modern PC society says. ---------- Post added 06-21-2012 at 08:41 AM ----------
Skills needed to get on with other human beings. hence social skills are key life skills. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |||
|
Member [04%]
|
Be the man your ideal woman would want to be with... Its really not rocket science and becoming that man will serve more than ones penis. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Suspended
MBTI: ENTJ
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,572
|
I don't see how "be yourself" is crap.
Which woman would fall for a man based not on his attributes? The fact is there is no set type that can get a date. Popular culture presents an image, but there really is not a type. it depends largely on the values of the individual involved. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |||
|
Member [02%]
|
I feel like it's not so much ingrained as it's still valid. The "assured provider type" forms the basis of what most people are looking for in a partner, especially if they want to start a family. Why wouldn't you want someone who's dependable and makes a good salary? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |||
|
Suspended
MBTI: ENTJ
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,572
|
I think dating is subjective, in that we all have different criteria for such. But IMO it's too PC to say that traditional male qualities are not a factor. To me this is why most say confidence is key. |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|