[rwm4768]

If it were me, I'd probably be gone after one day. I'd decide a million dollars (or whatever prize) just isn't worth it. I can't imagine being stuck with all those stupid people (especially in the case of anything on MTV) for any more than three seconds.

[fonmaneal]

ESTP is the way I would go; my alternate self(secondary).
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

But the INTJ is alway there.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

So, no killing. While it may be good for rating, it is bad for staying out of jail(I'm too pretty
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
).

[Amphorian]

If I was on there, I'd be talking to the camera about how crazy everyone is with a blank face. I'd be chatting up sociology. x3 It'd amuse me.

[Coralaisly]

the intj would probably bide his time & not make waves (after all.. he's on a gameshow. the purpose is to win & get whatever prize is waiting at the end). Probably wouldn't talk much because he's well aware that his social skills are slim to none & he doesn't want to give his strategy away. Not wanting to get voted off, he would make superficial friends with everyone in the house, and keep his searing comments to himself, thus appearing to be a minimal threat to the others and slipping under the radar, as people are more likely to vote someone they've had an argument off than someone who cooks, tidys up & is generally nice to everyone. After all, who on the surface appears to be the bigger threat? the guy who's yelling and throwing chairs around & breaking things in a fit when he finds out someone moved his socks, or the guy who mcgivered the phone back together w/ nothing but dental floss and a paperclip because the other guy threw and broke it? the people are gonna think "we need to keep the quiet one around, he's beneficial to the pack, and poses no threat" which, ironically, the guy who on the surface appears to pose the smallest threat poses the biggest threat... but we're talking reality show logic, not real logic here
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[vertigoh]

IMO it'd probably be an indicator that they should try another style of TV - while I can't say I'm exactly well versed in the history of reality TV there doesn't seem any commercial sense in putting an INTJ anywhere near the business end of a camera in that context. That said... if I was on one I'm pretty sure I'd be voted off early. I've seen little of them and found them insufferable on the screen. IRL I imagine I'd have less self control than others posting above - I just couldn't put up with idiots of that calibre for long enough to play a 'long game'. As rwm said, a million just isn't enough.

btw I'm new here, hello! *waves*

[kepstein8888]

Kind of what Coralaisly said: A good INTJ would lay low until the rest kill each other off, and win by default.