|
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
| Any INTP male - INTJ female couples out there? | intj, intj and intp, intp, relationship advice |
|
|
#26 | |||
|
Core Member [126%]
|
After that trust is achieved though, when those walls come down, they really come down. They seem to have only two settings: complete trust and complete mistrust. This seems to have caused my particular INTP quite a few problems. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |||
|
Core Member [411%]
|
Not sure I've ever gotten to the place of complete honesty and earnestness since part of their composition appears to be malleability. It maybe honest and earnest at the moment but they can flex to another...dimension?...reality? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Core Member [162%]
MBTI: INTP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,511
|
What makes you think there is a some sort of hidden core? Break through the onion skin layers only to find nothing at all in the middle. P-zombies with no soul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |||
|
Core Member [126%]
|
I've hacked the core (of my INTP). It smells like flowers in there. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |||
|
Core Member [411%]
|
Do you believe this? Are you informing or distracting us? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |||
|
Core Member [181%]
|
My guess is repeating, not originating, tired meme to see patterns in who takes the money and runs. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |||
|
Core Member [411%]
|
Strike the pose! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | ||||||||||||
|
Core Member [170%]
|
You see, that's not my problem at all. I want to do things with him not because I want people to see it (in fact, I do my very best to keep the number of people aware of our relationship to the minimum), but because I want to, shall we say, experience the world with him. Maybe it's different with INTPs, but going to the museum together, for instance, would be something I really enjoy. Shared experience is my favorite activity with someone I love.
With intimates, my wall comes down unless I get some sense that either 1. someone is in the room who shouldn't be hearing this 2. you're that person. I once had a friend I referred to as my "soulmate", because I told her everything and never felt that I was placing my deepest feelings in unsafe hands, but that was because I also knew her very core. We had such trust and reciprocity- the latter is what he is not giving me. He is tenacious in trying to understand me, but he would not let me understand him on the same level.
On the contrary, I do not see this as unreasonable. When you say: "I trust this person wouldn't do x", that is because you have evidence, for instance, past actions, or you know his character, that leads you to conclude something about this person's behavior. Trust is always future-oriented. There's no reason to trust someone you're doing a financial transaction with, for instance, if you're buying a hotdog in the park. You aren't depending on him in any future actions. But in another case, with credit, the creditor is making a prediction that you will not fail to pay. That's why taking out mortgage requires an income proof. It's akin to saying: This here is the document that I will continue to get money, so I will be able to pay my installments.
Every INTP is different, and I suppose some INTPs are really empty inside, but every INTP I have ever been good friends with (after they allowed me into their core, which didn't take that much time, surprisingly, but I let them in too) had a wealth of emotions inside. Even my boyfriend gives hints of its existence. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Member [34%]
|
That's just it though, the banker doesn't trust you at all, and why would he need to when the game is already rigged in his favor. The conflation your definition asserts is much the same as refusing to draw a distinction between bravery and a lack of fear. Trust is something that is derived from faith, not certainty. I don't mean faith in the sense of mindlessly unquestioning acceptance for that matter either, because blind faith asserts precisely the same conflation that I am contesting here. When I say faith, I mean the willingness to entertain the possibility that something may be true even though you don't know, and may very well never know that it is true, yet pursue it none the less, because there is something more there in the seeking than the answer itself.
You can only trust someone in so far as you do not have confidence in your ability to predict their actions with certainty. You may derive the strength of character to trust them from confidence in your own ability survive regardless of the outcome, or the knowledge that the choice is worth making even if you are incorrect, but there is no trust in limiting your acceptance of an individual to the behavior that you can predict reliably. The banker is no more trusting for insisting that you provide him proof that you are a reliable investment, than a soldier is brave for triumphantly driving a tank over an empty chicken shack. Sometimes you know your lover so well that you don't need to trust them, and that's fine too, but its not the same thing as trust. Nobody is perfect though, and the fear of vulnerability is certainly nothing exclusive to INTJs, so its not like I'm trying to suggest that you should beat yourself up over it. There is obviously something missing here that you need, but I don't think blaming him for the fact that you are afraid to trust him is going to help you find it, because he will quite simply never be able to provide you with enough leverage and dirt to make those feelings of fear and vulnerability go away.
Last edited by Indubitably; 07-07-2012 at 10:05 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Veteran Member [54%]
|
I typically idle at complete trust in people that I have just met, at least when it comes to things like my mind, body, and emotional well being. Things like money and secrets, not so much up front...but other than that I will throw myself into anyone, just to see if things stick. I adore intimacy of the mind so much, I literally hate to waste a single moment without it if I can help it.
Most (not all) internal feelers freak out over this, judge me as some kind of creepy small talk skipping abomination, and politely (or impolitely) tell me to go fuck myself. Which is fine. I am typically not interested in putting up with god knows how much facade, just to one day FINALLY break through to a real person, regardless of how precious and magical they fancy their own hidden unicorns. Those that CAN hang, though- and even better, offer the same instant trust and off the cuff honesty in return- make it into a zone of very special and sincere endearment. What I believe other posters in this forum have called "the complet trust" or "inner intp circle." The long way is of course still an option, and probably leads to even deeper levels of endearment, especially over lots of time and communication- but there IS a shortcut to the inner circle, I think...unless I'm rogue in this regard. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |||||||||
|
Core Member [181%]
|
No better gift than to be able to speak one's mind and hear another's. Make new things. Effort worth most of the possible pain trailing along.
Agreed. Internal mythical bestiaries are good for understanding a person and the things that might trip up that shared freedom but they're not the velveteen rabbit.
You're not. *sigh* Sometimes I think you're so on, other times...
Last edited by vampyroteuthis; 07-07-2012 at 11:52 PM.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Member [33%]
|
Me and my INTP are still just friends but like I see so much potential with the two of us, it makes my insides melt because she's that awesome :D
No actual contribution to the thread I just wanted everyone to know I'm basically on my to falling in love LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |||
|
Member [29%]
|
Yeah, I react to that kind of thing pretty much the same way I react to someone I just met trying to literally fuck me. Slut! Mind slut! Eek! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |||
|
Core Member [181%]
|
What did you think it meant? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
New Member [01%]
|
Have been dating this INTP for some time... We hit it off very quickly.
Positives: He is NOT intimidated by INTJ female. He encourages me to be me. Smart as hell. Can keep my brain occupied and interested. We both are dominant in our own ways and things pretty much event out in our relationship. Negatives: Scheduling, timing, planning, getting things done. He is pretty hopeless there. The good thing is that he is aware that those are my subject matter areas of expertise and he seems to rely on me to take the lead there. Oh… Somebody said that earlier… Sex is great. He managed to get my brain first, the rest on my body followed soon after. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |||
|
Member [27%]
|
I do the same. I also have a childish impulse to trust people. I also hate facade and small talk. I go straight to the "core" of the person and he/she will usually feel that I invade his/her personal space and run away. Of course I will also open up completely and try to show them who I really am, a complex person that will see right through them and will read between the lines of everything they say. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |||
|
Member [29%]
|
I was just going off the sex metaphor, but I really did think it was an attempt to build some kind of relationship rather than just an attempt to get some stimulation. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |||
|
Member [34%]
|
I think INTPs sometimes forget that other types aren't subject to the continual process of conceptual deconstruction that we inflict upon ourselves. Its almost like we are a kind of mental extremophile, everything we think and feel is stripped down to its core constituents for processing and refinement (with virtually no regard for the impact it might have on our ego) then rebuilt from the ground up, and quite frankly, this process is not the kind of thing that ever really has any sort of end to it. It may seem caustic or invasive to an INTJ, but for an INTP this kind of thing feels perfectly natural, so when we ask someone to jump into the hot tub with us we don't always stop to think that humans aren't comfortable in a 192 degree acid bath with a ph of 2. We often come out of the process feeling rejected and confused, because the response we get is almost invariably, "What the fuck are you trying to do, kill me?!", but we have no intent to cause harm, we just like to enjoy a nice relaxing sulfuric mud bath in the evenings because it opens up our pores and gives our skin a nice rosy glow, so we thought you might like to join us. Sometimes though, you just have to say, "No. I'm sorry but my proteins will denature and my identity will turn to a pile of goo if I answer that question right now, so I'm just not comfortable going there just yet". It may seem hurtful and confusing to the INTP at first, but once you kindly explain to them that your ideas and your identity just aren't separable like that, they will usually do their best to back off and give you some space to meet them half way in your own time. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Member [28%]
|
When I started to get to know my INTP friend, I've decided to go with an approach that was different than anything I've done before. I went for broke, I opened up, I granted complete access to the tiniest corner of my mind. Nothing about me or what I think is off limit for discussion. They are the sort of things that I normally guarded. I often engaged my Te and talked to my friend. Fi normally stayed under wrap. Incidentally, Indubitably was on the mark when he said that INTJs are not calm, we just have our emotion tightly coiled. Yes, there were times when I thought that it was unfair while he got complete access when I didn't know his opinions on many things.
It *is* unnerving to be analyzed. I know damn well that I *am* being analyzed, in his head. Every encounter, thoughts, writings have been processed, cataloged and added to his model about who I am. So why would I grant someone complete access? I let my INTP friend know that it is very uncomfortable for me to open up, but I do it anyway. May be he will open up, maybe he won't. In this dialogue, I am willing to be the first one because I think the reward can be spectacular. Maybe my strategy will not work, I don't know, unless I try. It is bizarre that being vulnerable can be quite liberating. It is like letting go of fear of being hurt. It is like jumping out of a perfectly good working airplane and have faith that the parachute will open. Agreed with someone said earlier that mature INTJ/INTP pairing could work. I don't think I can handle my INTP friend when I was younger. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | ||||||||||||
|
Member [27%]
|
I think this is a very big "turn on" for an INTP. I tend to "fall in love" with the people who are open, sincere and vulnerable. I have a genuine desire to "help" them and I want to share the most intimate emotions with them.
Maybe he did not tell you his opinion on many things because he wanted to protect you. A true INTP has an opinion about almost everything and those opinions may be extremely unconventional. I usually share my thoughts and emotions very easily, except when I consider that my ideas would be hurtful for the other person.
You are analyzed anyway so the best approach is to be sincere because an INTP will see through your masks and lose interest and respect if he discovers "incoherences".
Once you established an emotional connection, the INTP will genuinely care about your feelings. Being vulnerable is also "sharing" the burden of your emotions with someone else. If he understands you and he empathizes with you then it’s normal to have the "liberating feeling". |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |||
|
Member [28%]
|
Protect? or is it that one doesn't think unconventional view points would be receptive until some sort of reference has been established? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |||
|
Member [27%]
|
You are right. An INTP hates conventions and rules. The world, especially at an abstract level is a realm of endless possibilities, all to be considered and explored. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |||
|
Member [28%]
|
Wait! I thought that INTJs are supposed to be open-minded. How can one claim be open-minded if one is not willing to engage in debates to see different view points? Or am I guilty of painting immature & mature INTJs with the same brush? (just slight sarcasm here, understatement, perhaps?). How can one be sure that his/her belief would hold true if the belief is not subjected to some sort of deconstruct and cross-examination? As long as the idea/belief is what being discussed and not personal attack, then shouldn't it be a fair game for everyone? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |||
|
Member [05%]
|
yes yes hallelujah YES!
Last edited by Kryptonite; 07-10-2012 at 09:22 AM.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |||
|
Core Member [411%]
|
No. |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| intj, intj and intp, intp, relationship advice |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|