|
|
#126 | |||||||||
|
Member [09%]
|
Because Einstein himself could not complete relativity until he had heard from Grossmann with regard to Riemann. So, it is not speculation. This is part of the understanding of my exploration from a earlier time as I went inward. Is that the theories had schematic drawings if you like, follow the line of thinking in regards to what must be done with the theories as well as beneath the experiences. The non-euclidean geometries set Einstein free.
Dreaming is not located in the NPMR but in the PMR. One is looking for a way to connect with the NPMR. You see? We may talk about access to "universal consciousness" and we are ever widening our scope of knowledge.
Last edited by PlatoHagel; 07-01-2012 at 08:01 AM.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 | ||||||
|
Core Member [162%]
|
Definitively incorrect:
The rest of your post(s) seems to be about personal triggers. Cultural items, such as medicine wheels, mandala's, fiction literature, all can be organized under such triggers. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#128 | |||
|
Core Member [353%]
|
Prediction is a key point of the scientific method. A theory without a prediction cannot be tested, and therefore cannot be falsified. If your theory cannot fail, there's no way to know if you're right or wrong, and you have junk. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#129 | ||||||
|
Member [09%]
|
I'll have to track down where this was said..... but until then I stand corrected. Thanks
Jungian interpretations are not about triggers they are about understanding the differences between your experiences in life manifested within in the dream world, while .....there is other kinds of journeying going on. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#130 | |||
|
Core Member [162%]
|
Yeah, from a 'little picture' perspective which inherently leads to mistaken conclusions. Mistakes are valuable in themselves when used as an opportunity to correct oneself.
Last edited by RBM; 07-01-2012 at 02:59 PM.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Member [09%]
|
Drawings do help to compartmentalize, leave trails as image maps of where you have been. One might not have recognized these images before.
Oh, for sure.
Sure Jung is dead.....
......and here you are?
That's the distinction I was making in terms of "systemic ways" in which to realize a way too, the NPMR. There is a difference between "the dreamer" and the dreamed.
While you recognize the activation participation you have with the world and the ways in which you proceed, you are looking for ways in which to extend your boundary of knowledge....not just about the "objective reality" but about how one accesses the probabilities and futures. Kisai predictions.
Another individual who operates under the umbrella of the MBTi characterizations, and you have it all figured out. That's nice
Last edited by PlatoHagel; 07-02-2012 at 01:47 AM.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | ||||||
|
Core Member [353%]
|
Which MBTI characterizations?
I'm going to note that again, you're unable to explain what you're talking about. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#133 | ||||||
|
Member [09%]
|
The XXXX under your avatar and the fact you exist on this intj forum.
Crap.....I give you a link to a scientific process that is unfolding with all of its efforts and you do not know what I am talking about? You are acting from a safe zone when you repeat your mantras about science prediction and phenomenology by stating something that it is understood all across science. Nothing beyond that 'safe zone' to add? |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Member [02%]
MBTI: INTJ
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 81
|
@PH,
Interesting article(s) on supersymetry. If true, seems to still fit the digital VR theory where things are often paired but have mutually exclusive actualized properties (entanglement, duality, heisenberg, etc...). ie 0 or 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 | ||||||
|
Core Member [353%]
|
Neither are an MBTI characteristic.
Sorry, no. You have to explain. I'm not going off on a wild rabbit chase. Present your argument. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#136 | ||||||||||||
|
Member [09%]
|
@SJ10,
How would you convert unknowns to O and 1? Define it in a type of configuration space. You have to have some means with which to measure such a conversion to VR? To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
---------- Post added 07-03-2012 at 01:49 PM ----------
Ummm......
What argument? If you want science done right? Please.
Last edited by PlatoHagel; 07-03-2012 at 01:55 PM.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Member [09%]
|
A virtual world?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. The more complex the data base the more accurate one's simulation is achieved. The point is though that you have to capture scientific processes through calorimeter examinations just as you do in the LHC. So these backdrops are processes in identifying particle examinations as they approach earth or are produced on earth. See To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. and one might of asked how Fermi's picture taking would have looked had they pointed it toward the To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ? So the idea here is how you map particulates as a measure of natural processes? The virtual world lacks the depth of measure with which correlation can exist in the natural world? Why? Because it asks the designers of computation and memory to directly map the results of the experiments. So who designs the experiments to meet the data? How did they know the energy range that the Higg's Boson would be detected in?
Last edited by PlatoHagel; 07-06-2012 at 07:25 AM.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| astronomy, physics |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|