|
|
#26 | |||
|
Core Member [356%]
|
Obsidian, the character in question, was mentally ill for most of his storylines, then after he was cured, he then revealed himself to be gay (he still has tendencies to lose his temper and act violently). So, ummm.., under the continuity carpet. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |||
|
Core Member [111%]
|
Heh, kind of like how Northstar is no longer a French-Canadian separatist terrorist. (Does that ever come up anymore?) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |||
|
Core Member [234%]
|
Lots of people work jobs that require them to be away in order to put food on the table. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |||
|
Veteran Member [87%]
|
Sure, but Wonder Woman is as seriously stacked as old-fashioned Barbie, so no wonder she stays on the A-list. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||||||
|
Core Member [234%]
|
By acknowledging their sexual orientation and acting on it those guys I know got themselves an early death sentence, literally, by catching AIDS/HIV. Do you think that would not have happened if they had chosen to act on homosexuality earlier in their lives? Wouldn't that have increased their risk of catching that even earlier than they did?
The Joker would be a good gay villain. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |||
|
Core Member [246%]
MBTI: INFJ
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,844
|
Are drugs against the law because all drug dealers are shady, criminal types... or are all drug dealers shady, criminal types because drugs are against the law? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Core Member [143%]
|
I'm a bit surprised it wasn't Batman and Robin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Veteran Member [68%]
|
I'm still struggling with the new, non violent Popeye cartoons. I expect any day now to see Popeye getting it on with Bluto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |||
|
Core Member [106%]
|
It's not like HIV is a death sentence anymore. Current treatments seem to be effective. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |||
|
Core Member [246%]
MBTI: INFJ
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,844
|
Nothing of value would be lost. Popeye was one of the worst cartoons ever, and i'm surprised they're still making new ones |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |||
|
Core Member [145%]
|
JTG put it well, but they didn't "catch" HIV/AIDS because of a "gay lifestyle," much less their acknowledgement of it. It certainly doesn't sound like they were acknowledging it if they're sleeping with other men while they were married, does it? No, the more likely reason is because of an irresponsible sexual lifestyle. (Not to judge; acknowledging the fact, on a personal level, that sometimes people contract any number of communicable diseases regardless of lifestyle choice, i.e. not everyone who catches cholera drinks dirty water or doesn't wash their hands, etc.) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Member [08%]
|
I can see why parents who do not approve of homosexuality would be opposed to their kids' heroes being recast as homosexuals.
That said, DC is free publish comics with whatever characters, and parents are free to not buy them for their kids, should they so desire. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member [03%]
|
Cool. For the sake of sounding like an INTJ, the best way to progress homosexual acceptance, is to not spread around articles pointing out gay characters. If you're pointing something out, it's out of the ordinary. This thread, although everyone is responding receptively, makes homosexuality a topic of discussion as if we need to discuss it.
Watch some BBC, most of their shows from 2005 on, have had gay characters that aren't dwelled upon because it's not important to their character. This thread should have been about if a reboot was needed or how we can view the character in our economic times. His homosexuality shouldn't even be mentioned, because it doesn't define the character. EDIT: Not saying they shouldn't show it in the comic though, they should. The problem is acting like it's something crazy new. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Core Member [201%]
|
So is it the "gay version" or "Green Lantern" is gay?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|