Stuxnet Source Code

**Indefinable** · 10-19-2011, 05:44 PM

As many of you know, the Stuxnet source code is available on the net.
Now, I've been trying to understand the thousand lines of code inside the 19 hashtag files and their respective .c source codes.

I have come to a final verdict:
How did they manage to create such a beast?

**gestalt** · 10-19-2011, 06:12 PM

Moneyed professionals and/or black ops. I had thought that there were multiple levels of encryption. Which means that it might behoove one not to believe that what was "released" is what actually was. Last I checked Symantec had been leading the charge to figure it out and point fingers... and it looked a lot like NSA/Mossad. Badda bing.

**CallMeSpooky** · 10-19-2011, 06:41 PM

Stuxnet source hasn't been released. What you saw is decompiled code. It bears very, very little resemblance to the original source and is at times less readable than corresponding assembly. This is - definitely - not how it was written.

**tooboku** · 10-19-2011, 08:21 PM

^^ Yup. If they're right about who think they wrote it, it's never going to be released.

10-19-2011, 05:44 PM	#1
Indefinable Member [03%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 148	As many of you know, the Stuxnet source code is available on the net. Now, I've been trying to understand the thousand lines of code inside the 19 hashtag files and their respective .c source codes. I have come to a final verdict: How did they manage to create such a beast?
Indefinable is offline post a comment

10-19-2011, 06:12 PM	#2
gestalt Veteran Member [84%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 3,374	Moneyed professionals and/or black ops. I had thought that there were multiple levels of encryption. Which means that it might behoove one not to believe that what was "released" is what actually was. Last I checked Symantec had been leading the charge to figure it out and point fingers... and it looked a lot like NSA/Mossad. Badda bing.
gestalt is offline post a comment

10-19-2011, 06:41 PM	#3
CallMeSpooky Member [03%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 151	Stuxnet source hasn't been released. What you saw is decompiled code. It bears very, very little resemblance to the original source and is at times less readable than corresponding assembly. This is - definitely - not how it was written.
CallMeSpooky is offline post a comment

10-19-2011, 08:21 PM	#4
tooboku Member [36%] MBTI: INTJ Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,479	^^ Yup. If they're right about who think they wrote it, it's never going to be released.
tooboku is offline post a comment