|08-13-2011, 11:07 PM||#1|
New Member [01%]
Join Date: Mar 2011
The dominant functions (the most interesting concepts of the overall theory to me) are described in many words, especially Ni. But to get more insightful ideas, I think we should entitle the functions by a category. Such as...
At war or similar: Te- commander, Ti- assassin, Fe- field medic, Se and Si- basic soldiers
General characters: Si- caveman, Se- zombie, Ni- wizard, Ti- that little grey alien
Or the functions could have awards like...
Most complicated: Ni, Most organized: Te, Friendliest: Fe, Most ruthless: Te, Most fun: Ne, Most impulsive: Se, Most dependent: Si, Most insightful/ understanding: Ni
Another way is to assign a symbolic icon:
Ni's vision/insight/foresight, Te's order, Ne's randomness/brainstorm, Ti's analysis or calculator/textbook, Fi's diary, Fe's affection
What are some other ideas or improvements you forum bloggers can spawn?
---------- Post added 08-13-2011 at 10:15 PM ----------
Some favorites of mine from some site are the negative aspects of the types.
Istp: assassin, Intp: nerd, Infj: messiah, and the infamous Intj: crackpot. I love that analogy. To me though, the term crackpot is just another way of saying that a concept is to great for reality.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by henry15; 08-13-2011 at 11:10 PM. Reason: Improving
henry15 is offline
|08-24-2011, 05:15 PM||#5|
Core Member [133%]
Join Date: Oct 2009
Ti ~ Anti-authoritarians
Te ~ Masters of objectives
Fi ~ Impassioned
Fe ~ Compassioned
Ni ~ The perspective that renders our presence insignificant
Ne ~ The perspective of the distracted and bored
Si ~ The perspective of the familiar and incremental
Se ~ The perspective of the immediate possibilities
Its best not to confuse definitions by reinventing them whimsically. So its then more appropriate for:
Last edited by Tactical Panda; 08-24-2011 at 05:37 PM.
Tactical Panda is offline