|
|
#76 | |||
|
Veteran Member [86%]
|
Well, that and year-round nice weather puts them over the top. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |||
|
Core Member [138%]
|
--Who will decide exactly which categories of human should be on the "scum" list, and where will their pay come from? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | |||
|
Suspended
MBTI: iNtj
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,345
|
Perhaps some kind of yearly rental fee to offset the scumminess of the whole endeavor? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | ||||||
|
Veteran Member [86%]
|
You've heard of the Golden Rule, right? He who has the gold, makes the rules.
Umm..."an armed society is a polite society." The scum would be weeded out in short order, I think. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | ||||||||||||
|
Core Member [138%]
|
What, you mean the outpost on the open sea? "Year-round nice weather"? You're joking, right?
Are you going to set up facilities to make them? Or are you going to buy them?
Ah, so you envision the "islands" being run as plutocracies.
Again, that statement is incredibly vague. "There won't be any bad people because the good people will shoot them." |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Veteran Member [69%]
|
Yeah, sorry, the bad people are the ones who shoot good people, not the other way around. If someone will shoot a person who genuinely wrongs them, there's only a short step from there to killing everyone who stands in his way; he's already overcome his natural empathy response.
That said, I don't think we should be dismissing this concept entirely. Think about Microsoft and Paypaldude himself; they're both rich from products with no physical resources whatsoever. It's easy to collaborate with people from multiple countries, too, so they could have their corporate HQs in no man's land and outsource most of the labour. Think of Monaco for example, where to be a citizen (iirc) you have to buy a $500,000 share of the country. Sure, it's on land but it's a proof of concept for a lot of the issues being discussed here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | ||||||||||||
|
Core Member [153%]
|
They'd also make excellent additions to the human trafficking network. Geographically and politically isolated, totally dependent on a few rich patrons, and full of armed enforcers...it's a sex-slave pimp's dream.
I think you should replace the word "society" with "club."
To be fair, a lot of places started out as businesses, particularly on the various frontiers throughout history. The company towns got things started. They weren't sustainable, but no organization is; they just vary in how long they last on average. Getting the routes and infrastructure in place sets the stage for better organization later.
That's why I suggested they find some resource that's scarce in other places and mine it. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |||
|
Veteran Member [69%]
|
You could also make it a financial network hub. Yes, there are several ideal spots out in the middle of the ocean. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
New Member [01%]
|
I think this is a very interesting idea, though I am skeptical of it succeeding. Similar attempts have been tried in the past, and all have failed embarrassingly. I think the biggest problems these rig-societies will face is that if they ever come close to being too successful, some government somewhere is going to demand they be shut down.
I think they would be most successful in providing services currently illegal in countries they are near. For example, they could offer gambling, marijuana (though how would it grow in that climate I do not know), even prostitution. Of course, once people find out about this, government will come and shut it down. But still, it is an interesting concept. I think such ideas are more likely to succeed through reforms of the current system. For example, the Free State Project is another interesting idea. The basic concept is taking over a US state by simply concentrating a large number of libertarian-minded people there. The state of choice was New Hampshire because it is small and has a large congress to population ratio and is already sympathetic to more libertarian ideas. |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | ||||||
|
Veteran Member [79%]
|
A little petri dish will simply fail to reflect the larger, international effects of a libertarian regime (or lack thereof?)
LOL right, because a few rich uncles in cashmere sweaters with their heirloom shooters stand a chance against military tanks and explosives. |
||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|