Well my point was that the "human being" debate may be synonymous with that of "personhood". They're one and the same - at least, themuzicman has been using those terms interchangeably without admitting to it. If not, "human being" still doesn't have a precise definition. A thing may have human DNA without being a "human being".

Wow, that's an impressive rating. Are you hoping to get an IM title? I don't play any tournaments, I just play online games. Maybe we could play a few. I'm on Chess.com, my rating is under 1300. I couldn't say what my realistic USCF rating would be if I did play tournaments. I'm always interested in discussing the fundamentals of chess though.

It's one of mine as well as a passion. I'm a birth mother.

My pleasure

ahaha, thankee!

Freehold eh? I'm like 25 minutes from there

I read that in a textbook for a class I had in high school. If I find something about it on teh interweb I shall let you know. But I experimented on it and found it to be true. When I look at any three objects in any order, from any distance, say kids running around kicking a soccer ball, I instantly recognize the quantity to be three. Any more than three, and you may have to stop for half of a second to count.

Did she know what a continent was?

You need a standards document then.

You need a standards document then.