Well said especially the first paragraph!

Thanks for your continued clarity in your posts on these matters. Your Ni description is remarkably apt. I try to analogize Ni as knowing the equation of gravity (Ni), the current position and velocities of planets (Se), and then using that Ni-understanding to determine the positions of planets thousands of years into the future or the past. Very parallel to your "trajectories" analogy.

Nice explanation and post.

*dies laughing*

That does sum it up pretty nicely, methinks! Thanks for the chuckle.

dear indubitably, I have had a lovely evening reading your bits of stuff and drinking whiskey. I feel blessed.

nice post.

Perceptive. I will ponder on this.

Amazing post. Really made me think. Thank you!

exactly.

thats awesome

First paragraph here is phenomenal. Hats off, extremely well said.

Please enjoy this tiny excerpt from the book, affectionately known as the Crab Canon. No context needed, really: http://www.evl.uic.edu/swami/crabcanon

Speaking of recursion, have you ever read Godel Escher Bach?

interesting train of thought. Will think about this some more.

Challenge accepted.

If you happen to be a Twilight Zone fan, you should weigh in on this: http://intjforum.com/showthread.php?t=85310

ah, le petit mort. death is definitely more seductive than floppy fish, yes.

lol, uh... no, no it doesnt!

I'd answer the question of why men who are slighted go after women who aren't the one's who slighted them while I was at it.