Visitor Messages

Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 20 of 501
  1. ManWithNoName
    07-22-2014 03:22 PM
    ManWithNoName
    What did you mean then?
  2. FarmlandTension
    07-22-2014 11:28 AM
    FarmlandTension commented on Member Pictures: Volume 22
    Looks like a pretty nicely healing scar.
  3. Dancingqueen
    07-21-2014 04:46 PM
    Dancingqueen
    I'm still doing it wrong because now I just see a feminazi claiming rape every time her [real] man propositions her for sex. On wait, you said 30 degrees to the right, not the left... now I see it!
  4. Dancingqueen
    07-21-2014 04:36 PM
    Dancingqueen
    Funny, all I see is Cerberus versus Batman.
    Being a dick is not a gender issue and you can be one whether you have one or not. I agree, the perspectives are fascinating and I'm greatly enjoying the ping pong match with the invisible ball.
  5. Dancingqueen
    07-21-2014 04:17 PM
    Dancingqueen
    I think it's hilarious that everyone's position is transparent due to the fact that they are basing that position on no actual real world information. It's a Rorschach test.
  6. Dancingqueen
    07-21-2014 03:29 PM
    Dancingqueen
    Too much agenda soap boxing, not enough empathy or good intentions all around.
  7. Dancingqueen

     
    people are quick to take 'sides' to push their own agendas which is interesting in its own light.

    TRUTH!

  8. lor6
    07-06-2014 02:37 PM
    lor6
    I understand there are differences between the preferences, but don't see their relevance to the discussion, since the main argument related to the dating arena is that someone changes themselves to match someone else's preferences, in this case men, with respect to displaying emotionality, are changing to appeal to women. Regardless if the perception of what the change required is, is accurate or not, there's still no reason to change oneself according to others' desires. The influence only exists because some men allow it to - they don't have to appeal to women, not to mention forming a relationship by pretending to be someone you're not is not exactly a success.

    The 'blame' formulation is mine, but I find 'can perpetuate the repression' is not very different to it, just a 'nicer' way of phrasing it.

    I'm not sure people are conflating the terms. I agree that the repression in men/boys begins in childhood and I think it's the 'root' problem of all others. I'm not sure if you were referring to the confusion of the terms solely in the context of dating, but in general, I think by 'unemotional' people quite literally means lack of emotions, and not simply someone who is calm. For example, men are less likely to seek help for depression or other mental health issues, because it would be perceived as weak or something like that. So it's not solely not displaying the emotions outwardly that is expected, but not actually feeling them to an extent. As for dating, in the role of a stereotypical 'provider', I think that type of relationship does not involve intimacy and resembles more a business arrangement.
  9. lor6
    07-06-2014 01:15 PM
    lor6
    I don't think it's relevant to that particular discussion whether the preferences regard physical or abstract traits - still perfectly allowed preferences.

    I'm not sure who conflates the terms; do you mean men think they must appear unemotional in order to appeal to women, thus become repressed, when in fact women only want someone 'stoic'? The part I don't understand is how a person is held responsible because someone else chooses to change themselves in order to appear desirable to them.
  10. lor6
    Yeah, sorry; I'm not disinterested, but I didn't understand the argument or the comparisons you added at all. I will take everything you wrote to reflect upon.
  11. Ghoster
    I'm amazed that you're still going. I would have given up on her ages ago. But your posts are good reads, so thank you.
  12. Doob
    Just wanted to say that I really appreciate your posts in this thread and that you are genuinely interested in understanding where the other is coming from and to come to an understanding.
  13. Moxiie
    07-03-2014 05:34 PM
    Moxiie commented on What is your honest opinion of the above poster?
    heh. Eerie INFJ observation skills.
  14. Seriously
    lol fair enough
  15. ShadowBurn
    07-02-2014 01:47 PM
    ShadowBurn commented on Why aren't rape jokes considered funny?
    Thanks for the backup on this. I greatly appreciate it. He has no idea what he is talking about.
  16. Dancingqueen
    07-01-2014 06:11 PM
    Dancingqueen
    Pics are great just remember there are rules against excessive luridity.
  17. Dancingqueen
    07-01-2014 04:53 PM
    Dancingqueen
    In that case, maybe you can have a rod inserted in your brain that will do the typing for you as you think the thought. Just make sure you set it to the right spelling; oh, also make sure it filters out the dirty thoughts before they hit the screen.
  18. Dancingqueen
    07-01-2014 04:36 PM
    Dancingqueen
    sory that only aplies to TJs. disqualified. we don't even need to capitalize, cause what's the point??
    *twitches at the speling*
  19. Dancingqueen
    Thanks Plato, you Americans can't spell, can you? For reference: flavour not flavor.
  20. Weltschmerzer
    Your recovery seems to be going well.

About Me

  • About Plato
    Gender
    Male
  • Personality
    MBTI Type
    INFJ

Statistics

Total Posts
Visitor Messages
General Information
  • Join Date: 10-04-2011
  • Referrals: 0

Friends

Showing Friends 1 to 15 of 15

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Myers-Briggs, and MBTI are trademarks or registered trademarks of the
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Trust in the United States and other countries.