That's an excellent analysis

well said.

Anything you make from an asset increasing in value OVER AND ABOVE the general rate of inflation, is the same as any other income.

Why not try to.understand people and have a conversation instead of writing people off as stupid when you don't get their meaning?

And you assumed I did not understand.

I aced advanced, 300 level, "flunk-out" economics courses at a top 20 school of business. Your condescension is iritating.

I meant to say - glad that's changing. You'll kill yourself that way, and for what? You're smart enough to figure out a better way to do it. (When you do, let me know.)

Definitely that. I've almost never seen men play golf alone. I would imagine many business meetings would be over golf the same way they'd be over lunch.

His posts are definitely problematic imho.

Thanks. I do occasionally refrain from evil long enough to attempt to help others. Actually, that's what I like best about my career.

Categorical Imperative and Utilitarianism debunked:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFSvs...ailpage#t=207s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vueEq...ofilepage#t=9s

Likewise.

Thanks

Agreed.

Get an avatar already.

thx... to succeed in life and any goals you have, you will need to be an "E" on the career side of life... it is very hard to succeed as an "I", not impossible, but not as easy as an "E"

Congratulations. As far as I know, Descartes was not the first one to argue "I think, therefore I am", nor will he be the last. The sentence belongs to the public domain.

The interesting bit is that if you understood Descartes, you wouldn't disbelief and I wouldn't renounce of him. 'To be' in the context of cogito ergo sum is to be res cogitans, which is not necessarily to be res extensa, as the argument of res cogitans comes before realization of res extensa.

I didn't speak Descartes theory according to you (and I agree): "The statement does NOT say 'I think because I am.' [...] Rewording Decartes, 'I weightlift, therefore I am strong.'[...]". Why would you suggest now that I do? And why would you suggest I don't believe rocks exist? Because, summing up, and I quote you, you're an ass.

"Rocks exist." Weren't you the one who wanted to follow Descartes? (I didn't mention him.) What kind of argument are you using to say such a thing? "Rocks exist." Not the kind of sentence Descartes would use at the start of a paragraph. If he had been as methodological as you are here, he wouldn't be remembered.

I don't know what you mean by saying this: "Rocks don't think (at least I don't think they do)."

Get an avatar. You'll look nicer!