futureperfect5
09-29-2007, 05:34 PM
Well, that was getting too confusing. Whatever he said ...
this is what I meant:
1 - I like being being treated well and I like treat others well.
I think the only real reason to behave with manners and politeness is if it comes from you, not society.
2 - I think that there are ways to be chivalrous, even in the 21c which are necessary or even valid
however, again - voluntary. However, medieval chivalry was appropriate then, now probably now.
3 - There is a kind of "nobility" connected with actions that are menat to bring honor and dignity to situation.
I would support them as well, for myself -- I do not imposed my ideas or needs on others.
Nor is it appropriate to make assumptions without asking for clarification -- these are broad terms.
I support equality for females in all aspects. However, I do not feel that having equality means not being extended courteous.
this is what I meant:
1 - I like being being treated well and I like treat others well.
I think the only real reason to behave with manners and politeness is if it comes from you, not society.
2 - I think that there are ways to be chivalrous, even in the 21c which are necessary or even valid
however, again - voluntary. However, medieval chivalry was appropriate then, now probably now.
3 - There is a kind of "nobility" connected with actions that are menat to bring honor and dignity to situation.
I would support them as well, for myself -- I do not imposed my ideas or needs on others.
Nor is it appropriate to make assumptions without asking for clarification -- these are broad terms.
I support equality for females in all aspects. However, I do not feel that having equality means not being extended courteous.